(PC) Jolivette v. Superior Court of California, County of Solano et al
Paul Patrick Jolivette |
Wendy G. Getty and Superior Court of California, County of Solano |
2:2021cv00332 |
February 22, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Edmund F Brennan |
Kimberly J Mueller |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 MOTION for Entry of Default by Paul Patrick Jolivette. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 8 OBJECTIONS to FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS #7 by Paul Patrick Jolivette. (Reader, L) |
Filing 7 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/19/2021 RECOMMENDING Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. #2 ) be denied; and Plaintiff be ordered to pay the $402 filing fee within fourteen days from the date of any order adopting these findings and recommendations and be warned that failure to do so will result in the dismissal of this action. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations.(Becknal, R) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #7 Findings and Recommendations served on Paul Patrick Jolivette. (Becknal, R) |
Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY). This case has been assigned to Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller and Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. The new case number is: 2:21-cv-00332 KJM EFB (PC). (Becknal, R) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: 5 Clerk's Notice Reassigning Case served on Paul Patrick Jolivette. (Becknal, R) |
Filing 6 REQUEST FOR STATUS Re: Summons and REQUESET for copies by Paul Patrick Jolivette. (Mena-Sanchez, L)(Response sent: "The court will issue an order regarding service of process in due course. Copies of the docket are included as a courtesy this one time only. See above about copies of documents/docket sheets in the future.") Modified on 3/15/2021 (Plummer, M). |
Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Becknal, R) |
CLERKS NOTICE (TEXT ONLY): The Clerk of Court is in receipt of a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is DIRECTED to submit a Certified Prison Trust account statement for Paul Patrick Jolivette, CDCR# T-40846 to the Clerks Office within 72 business hours of this notification. The Prison Trust Account statement must reflect the activity for the last six months. Please email the certified prison trust account statement in pdf format to FilingsSacramento@caed.uscourts.gov with the case number in the subject line as reflected on this notification. (Yin, K) |
Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 3/29/2021 (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Rodriguez, E) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Paul Patrick Jolivette. (Rodriguez, E) |
Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Paul Patrick Jolivette. (Rodriguez, E) |
Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Wendy G. Getty, Superior Court of California, County of Solano by Paul Patrick Jolivette. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rodriguez, E) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.