(PC) Bouras v. Jones et al
| George J. Bouras |
| Case Worker, S. Sanga, Abdela and Scott Jones |
| 2:2021cv00350 |
| February 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Dennis M Cota |
| Kimberly J Mueller |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 4/15/21 ORDERING plaintiff shall submit on the form provided by the Clerk of the Court, within 30 days from the date of this order, a complete application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, with the required certified copy of his trust account statement, or the appropriate filing fee. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send Plaintiff a new form Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner. (Plummer, M)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #11 Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis, and prisoner IFP form served on George J. Bouras. (Plummer, M) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 4/8/2021 DIRECTING the Clerk of the Court to randomly assign a District Judge and to update the docket to reflect the new case number. This case was not assigned to a District Judge when the case was filed and the parties have not consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. The Court now finds that assignment of a District Judge is necessary to properly address the case. Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller added. New Case Number: 2:21-cv-00350-KJM-DMC. (Tupolo, A)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #10 Order served on George J. Bouras. (Tupolo, A) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE by George J. Bouras re the filing of #8 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. (Kastilahn, A) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by George J. Bouras. (Kastilahn, A) Modified on 3/31/2021 (Plummer, M). |
|
Filing 7
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 3/9/2021 ORDERING Plaintiff to submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, a complete application for leave to proceed IFP with the required certified copy of his trust account statement, or the appropriate filing fee. (Henshaw, R)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #7 Order and IFP application served on George J. Bouras. (Henshaw, R) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Rodriguez, E) |
| Filing 5 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 3/29/2021. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Flores, E) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER Transferring Case to the Sacramento Division of the Eastern District of California signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 02/24/2021. New Case Number 2:21-cv-350 DMC (PC). (Flores, E)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #5 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider, #4 Order served on George J. Bouras. (Flores, E) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Injunctive Relief by George J. Bouras. (Flores, E) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by George J. Bouras. (Flores, E) |
| Filing 1 (1983) PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Abdela, Case Worker, Scott Jones, S. Sanga by George J. Bouras.(Flores, E) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
