Hin v. U.S. Dept. of Justice U.S. Marshals, et al.,
| Sokcheath Hin |
| Adam Groff, Christopher Bryan Slate, County of San Joaquin, City of Stockton, M. Guillen, State of California, U.S. Department of Justice United States Marshals Service, Myers, Berchtold and Gutierrez |
| 2:2021cv00393 |
| March 3, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Troy L Nunley |
| Jeremy D Peterson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 23
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 4/29/2021 GRANTING #22 Stipulation for Extension, GRANTING the parties until 14 days from the date the last answer is filed with the Court to confer as required under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f). (Coll, A)
|
| Filing 22 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Extension to Conduct FRCP 26(f) Conference by State of California. (Esquivel, Diana) |
| Filing 21 REPLY by Berchtold, County of San Joaquin in support of #12 Motion to Dismiss. (Berry, Mark) |
| Filing 20 MOTION to DISMISS by State of California. Motion Hearing set for 5/27/2021 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley. (Esquivel, Diana) |
| Filing 19 REQUEST for Removal of Party From Service List by City of Stockton et al. (Ghannam, Jamil) |
| Filing 18 MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy M. Krueger for District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 4/12/2021 GRANTING the parties' Stipulation (ECF No. #17 ). The deadline for Defendant State of California to respond to the Complaint is hereby EXTENDED to 4/19/2021. (Text Only Entry) (Krueger, M) |
| Filing 17 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for 10-Day Extension for Defendant Sate of Cal. to Respond to Complaint by State of California. (Esquivel, Diana) |
| Filing 16 MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy M. Krueger for District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 4/8/2021: On the Court's own motion, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. #12 ) is hereby SUBMITTED without oral argument. Accordingly, the hearing set for 4/29/2021 is VACATED. If the Court determines oral argument is necessary, it will be scheduled at a later date. Defendants may still file a reply brief in accordance with Local Rule 230(d) and the 4/29/2021 date. (TEXT ONLY ENTRY) (Krueger, M) |
| Filing 15 OPPOSITION by Sokcheath Hin to #12 Motion to Dismiss. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Narek Postajian)(Eslamboly-Hakim, Sharona) Modified on 4/9/2021 (Tupolo, A). |
| Filing 14 MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy M. Krueger for District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/31/2021: Defendant State of California has filed an objection to the Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order (ECF No. 2) "to the extent that it requires that the parties file a single motion for summary judgment or cross-motion for summary judgment." (ECF No. #13 at 1.) To clarify, the Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order does not require all Defendants to file a single motion for summary judgment or cross-motion for summary judgment, but requires all issues each party wishes to resolve on summary judgment to be raised in one motion or cross-motion. (Text Only Entry) (Krueger, M) |
| Filing 13 OBJECTIONS by Defendant State of California to #2 Civil New Case Documents for TLN. (Esquivel, Diana) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to DISMISS by Berchtold, County of San Joaquin. Motion Hearing set for 4/29/2021 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley. (Attachments: #1 Points and Authorities, #2 Declaration of Mark E. Berry)(Berry, Mark) Modified on 3/25/2021 (Kastilahn, A). |
|
Filing 11
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/23/2021 ORDERING that Defendants Officer Berchtold, and County of San Joaquin, shall file a responsive pleadings on or before 3/24/2021. (Reader, L)
|
| Filing 10 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Extension of Time for Defendants to File a Responsive Pleadingto File by Berchtold, County of San Joaquin. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Berry, Mark) |
|
Filing 9
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/8/2021 EXTENDING time to 4/9/2021, in which Defendant State of California shall file its response to the complaint. (Tupolo, A)
|
|
Filing 8
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/8/2021 ORDERING that all claims and causes of action as to Defendants City of Stockton, Christopher Bryan Slate, Detective Gutierrez, Detective M. Guillen and Detective Myers only be DISMISSED with prejudice, with Plaintiff and Defendants each bearing their own attorney's fees and costs. Defendants' Rule 12 Motion scheduled for hearing on 4/1/2021 to be taken off calendar. (Tupolo, A)
|
| Filing 7 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for 30-Day Extension for Defendant State of Cal. to Respond to Complaint by State of California. Attorney Esquivel, Diana added. (Esquivel, Diana) |
| Filing 6 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER of Dismissal by City of Stockton, M. Guillen, Gutierrez, Myers, Christopher Bryan Slate. (Ghannam, Jamil) Modified on 3/8/2021 (Zignago, K.). |
| Filing 5 CONSENT to JURISDICTION and Removal; Joinder to City of Stockton's Removal #1 by Berchtold, County of San Joaquin. Attorney Berry, Mark Emmett added. (Berry, Mark) Modified on 3/3/2021 (Krueger, M). |
| Filing 4 MOTION to DISMISS by City of Stockton, et al., Motion Hearing set for 4/1/2021 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities, #2 Request for Judicial Notice, #3 Ex. 1)(Ghannam, Jamil) Modified on 3/3/2021 (Kaminski, H). |
| Filing 3 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Ghannam, Jamil) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Benson, A.) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from San Joaquin County Superior Court, case number STK-CV-UPI-2020-0007128 by City of Stockton, M. Guillen, Gutierrez, Myers and Slate. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0972-9449904) (Attachments: #1 Superior Court Summons and Complaint, #2 Proofs of Service and Superior Court Register of Actions, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ghannam, Jamil) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
