Janovich v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Timothy P. Janovich |
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |
2:2021cv00402 |
March 5, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Kendall J Newman |
Troy L Nunley |
Real Property: Foreclosure |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1444 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 REPLY by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. to #6 Opposition to Motion. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Marum, J.) |
Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy M. Krueger for District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 4/1/2021: Pursuant to Plaintiff's Request for Dismissal (ECF No. #7 ), Plaintiff's Fourth Cause of Action for Violation of RESPA (12 USC 2605) is DISMISSED without prejudice. Plaintiff's request for set aside damages is also DISMISSED without prejudice. (TEXT ONLY ENTRY) (Krueger, M) |
Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy M. Krueger for District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 4/1/2021: On the Court's own motion, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. #5 ) is hereby SUBMITTED without oral argument. Accordingly, the hearing set for 4/15/2021 is VACATED. If the Court determines oral argument is necessary, it will be scheduled at a later date. Defendant may still file a reply brief in accordance with Local Rule 230(d) and the 4/15/2021 date. (TEXT ONLY ENTRY) (Krueger, M) |
Filing 7 REQUEST for DISMISSAL by Timothy P. Janovich. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Sargetis, John) Modified on 4/1/2021 (Krueger, M). |
Filing 6 OPPOSITION by Timothy P. Janovich to #5 Motion to Dismiss. Attorney Sargetis, John Steve added. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Sargetis, John) |
Filing 5 MOTION to DISMISS by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. Motion Hearing set for 4/15/2021 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley. (Attachments: #1 Request for Judicial Notice, #2 Memorandum of Point and Authorities, #3 Proof of Service)(Marum, J.) Modified on 3/12/2021 (Reader, L). |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Marum, J.) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of SERVICE by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. re #1 Notice of Removal, #2 Civil New Case Documents for TLN. (Marum, J.) |
Filing 2 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Benson, A.) |
Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Sacramento County Superior Court, case NO 34-02020-00290820 by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.(Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0972-9456368) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Marum, J.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Janovich v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Timothy P. Janovich | |
Represented By: | Stephen J. Foondos |
Represented By: | John Steve Sargetis |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | |
Represented By: | Gianna Elizabeth Segretti |
Represented By: | J. Barrett Marum |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.