(PC) Loveless v. Parole Authorities of the California Board of Parole Hearings
| Michael J. Loveless |
| Parole Authorities of the California Board of Parole Hearings |
| 2:2021cv00430 |
| March 10, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Dennis M Cota |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
DOCUMENT(S) SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: IFP served on the Director of CDCR pursuant #6 Order Directing Prisoner Payment. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from the Prison Account of Michael J. Loveless signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 3/23/2021.The appropriate agency shall collect an initial partial filing fee and thereafter the balance in monthly payments and forward to the Clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDCR. The Clerk shall also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDCR, Financial) (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 3/23/2021 GRANTING plaintiff's #2 request to proceed ifp. (Yin, K)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Order Directing Prisoner Payment, #5 Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis served on Michael J. Loveless. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing 4
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Rodriguez, E)
|
|
RE-SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider re-served on Michael J. Loveless with CDCR #. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing 3
PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; E-Filing Notice issued re complaint filed *3/10/2021*; Consent or Decline due by 4/15/2021 (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter, #2 E-Filing Notice) (Rodriguez, E)
|
|
SERVICE BY EMAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Michael J. Loveless. (Rodriguez, E)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Michael J. Loveless. (Rodriguez, E)
|
|
Filing 1
PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Parole Authorities of the California Board of Parole Hearings by Michael J. Loveless. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rodriguez, E)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: (PC) Loveless v. Parole Authorities of the California Board of Parole Hearings | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michael J. Loveless | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Parole Authorities of the California Board of Parole Hearings | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
