Thomas v. City of Chico et al
| Donell Tramaine Thomas |
| City of Chico, Chico Police Department and Michael Rodden |
| 2:2021cv00562 |
| March 26, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Dennis M Cota |
| Morrison C England |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 PROOF of SERVICE re Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order by Chico Police Department, City of Chico, Michael Rodden. (Colvin, Roger) Modified on 4/12/2021 (Zignago, K.). |
| Filing 4 ANSWER with Jury Demand by Chico Police Department, City of Chico, Michael Rodden.(Colvin, Roger) |
| Filing 3 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Baumbach, Larry) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Benson, A.) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Butte County Superior Court, case number 21CV00383 by All Defendants. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0972-9504495) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Notice of Interested Parties)(Colvin, Roger) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
