(PS) Reyes v. Kaiser Permanente Foundation Hospital
Plaintiff: Irvin Reyes
Defendant: Kaiser Permanente Foundation Hospital
Case Number: 2:2021cv00571
Filed: March 29, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Carolyn K Delaney
Referring Judge: Kimberly J Mueller
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 21 JUDGMENT dated *1/12/2022* pursuant to order signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/11/2022. (Reader, L)
January 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/11/2022 ADOPTING in FULL #19 Findings and Recommendations. Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(b) for failure to prosecute, and the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. CASE CLOSED(Reader, L)
January 12, 2022 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #21 Judgment, #20 Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations, served on Irvin Reyes. (Reader, L)
November 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 19 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/19/21 RECOMMENDING that Plaintiff's claims be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute and case be closed. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections to F&Rs due within 14 days. (Benson, A.)
November 19, 2021 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #19 Findings and Recommendations served on Irvin Reyes. (Benson, A.)
October 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 10/12/21 VACATING 11/17/21 initial scheduling conference; ORDERING plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE in writing within 30 days why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff may satisfy this OSC by either: a. Filing a status report explaining whether plaintiff has received communication from defendant regarding this suit, and whether and how plaintiff intends to proceed with this suit; or b. Requesting entry of default against Kaiser by the Clerk of Court. (Benson, A.)
October 12, 2021 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #18 Order to Show Cause served on Irvin Reyes. (Benson, A.)
September 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 17 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Kaiser Permanente Foundation Hospital served on 8/16/2021. (Coll, A)
September 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Coll, A)
August 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff Irvin Reyes. (Kaminski, H)
June 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 COPY of LETTER from Kaiser Permanente by Irvin Reyes. (Benson, A.)
June 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 11/17/2021 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (CKD) before Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Coll, A)
June 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Kaiser Permanente Foundation Hospital* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Irvin Reyes* *5135 Mack Road* *Apt 293* *Sacramento, CA 95823*. (Coll, A)
June 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 6/17/2021 DISCHARGING #4 Order to Show Cause and DIRECTING plaintiff to file proof of service or of defendant's waiver of service on defendant Kaiser Permanente within 90 days. (Coll, A)
June 17, 2021 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #11 Order, #12 Summons, & #13 Civil New Case Documents for KJM served on Irvin Reyes. (Coll, A)
May 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 RESPONSE by Irvin Reyes to #4 Order as to why the dismissal of the prior state court action should not bar this suit. (Benson, A.)
May 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NOTICE re EXHIBITS by Irvin Reyes. (Tupolo, A)
May 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy J. Streeter for Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 05/14/2021: Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time (ECF No. #7 ) is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall respond to the court's April 27, 2021 order (ECF No. #4 ) by May 27, 2021. (Text Only Entry)(Streeter, J)
May 14, 2021 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: 8 Minute Order served on Irvin Reyes. (Streeter, J)
May 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MOTION for 7-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME to file response to order explaining why action is not barred by res judicata filed by Irvin Reyes. (Reader, L)
May 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE and EXHIBITS by Irvin Reyes (Reader, L)
May 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 OBJECTIONS to FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS #3 by Plaintiff Irvin Reyes. (Kaminski, H)
April 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 4/27/21 VACATING #3 Findings and Recommendations and DENYING as moot #2 Motion to Proceed IFP. Within fourteen (14) days of entry of this order, plaintiff shall file a written response explaining why this action is not barred by res judicata. If plaintiff determines that his case should not proceed, he may also file a notice of voluntary dismissal, in which case his $402 filing fee payment will be refunded to him. (Kaminski, H)
April 27, 2021 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Order, served on Irvin Reyes. (Kaminski, H)
April 26, 2021 Opinion or Order RECEIPT number #CAE200113665 $402.00 by Irvin Reyes on 4/26/2021. (Kaminski, H)
April 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 [VACATED per order of 4/27/21] FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 4/19/21 RECOMMENDING that #2 Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis be denied; the action be dismissed with prejudice and the Clerk be directed to close this case. Matter REFERRED to District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. (Kastilahn, A) Modified on 4/27/2021 (Kaminski, H).
April 19, 2021 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Findings and Recommendations served on Irvin Reyes. (Kastilahn, A)
April 2, 2021 Opinion or Order APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Court Action Required. (Benson, A.)
March 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Irvin Reyes. (Kaminski, H)
March 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kaiser Permanente Foundation Hospital by Irvin Reyes. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kaminski, H)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (PS) Reyes v. Kaiser Permanente Foundation Hospital
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Irvin Reyes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kaiser Permanente Foundation Hospital
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?