(PC) Sylvester v. Jones et al
William Lee Sylvester and William Sylvester |
Pfau, Saika, Shawn Hampton, J. Villanueva, Brandon Luke, Limbird, Scott Jones and Donald Washington |
2:2021cv00605 |
April 2, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Allison Claire |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 MOTION for PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION by William Sylvester. (Reader, L) |
Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Rodriguez, E) |
Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 5/10/2021 (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Rodriguez, E) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on William Lee Sylvester. (Rodriguez, E) |
Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by William Lee Sylvester. (Rodriguez, E) |
Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Shawn Hampton, Scott Jones, Limbird, Brandon Luke, Pfau, Saika, J. Villanueva, Donald Washington by William Lee Sylvester.(Rodriguez, E) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.