(UD)(PS) Covington v. Lee et al
| Sharon A. Covington |
| Delilah Sterio and Angelo Lee |
| 2:2021cv00679 |
| April 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Troy L Nunley |
| Jeremy D Peterson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1444 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 4/20/2021 REMANDING CASE to Sacramento County Superior Court and DENYING AS MOOT #2 Motion to Proceed IFP. Certified copy of remand order sent to other court. CASE CLOSED. (Tupolo, A)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Order served on Angelo Lee. (Tupolo, A) |
| Filing 3 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Rodriguez, E) |
| APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Court Action Required. (Benson, A.) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Angelo Lee. (Benson, A.) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Sacramento County Superior Court, Case number 20UD01804 filed by Angelo Lee. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Benson, A.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
