Miles Market et al v. USA
Plaintiff: Adbulhayoom Mohamed Meerasahib, Ummal Faridha Mohamed Meerasahib and Miles Market
Defendant: United States of America
Case Number: 2:2021cv00701
Filed: April 19, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Kendall J Newman
Referring Judge: William B Shubb
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 15, 2021 Filing 6 STIPULATION to Continue Deadline for Response to Complaint by United States of America. Attorney Carter, William Dean added. (Carter, William)
April 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 PRO HAC VICE ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 4/27/2021 GRANTING #2 Application for Pro Hac Vice. Added attorney Andrew Z. Tapp, PHV for Miles Market, Ummal Faridha Mohamed Meerasahib, & Adbulhayoom Mohamed Meerasahib. (Coll, A)
April 19, 2021 Filing 4 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 8/2/2021 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Tupolo, A)
April 19, 2021 Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *United States of America* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Zein E. Obagi, Jr.* *Obagi Law Group, P.C.* *811 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1721* *Los Angeles, CA 90017*. (Tupolo, A)
April 19, 2021 Filing 2 PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION and PROPOSED ORDER submitted by Miles Market, Adbulhayoom Mohamed Meerasahib and Ummal Faridha Mohamed Meerasahib for attorney Andrew Z Tapp to appear Pro Hac Vice. (Filing fee $ 225, receipt number 0972-9550497) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Obagi, Zein)
April 19, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against USA by All Plaintiffs. Attorney Obagi, Zein E. added. (Obagi, Zein) (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0972-9550348) (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Miles Market et al v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Adbulhayoom Mohamed Meerasahib
Represented By: Zein E. Obagi, Jr.
Represented By: Andrew Z. Tapp, PHV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ummal Faridha Mohamed Meerasahib
Represented By: Zein E. Obagi, Jr.
Represented By: Andrew Z. Tapp, PHV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Miles Market
Represented By: Zein E. Obagi, Jr.
Represented By: Andrew Z. Tapp, PHV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Represented By: William Dean Carter, GOVT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?