Vega v. Sanofi US Services, Inc., et al
Plaintiff: Teresa Vega
Defendant: Sanofi US Services, Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc. and Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC
Case Number: 2:2021cv00730
Filed: April 23, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Deborah Barnes
Referring Judge: Troy L Nunley
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 PRO HAC VICE ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 5/11/21 ADDING Attorney Richard M. Paul, III, PHV for Teresa Vega. (Kastilahn, A)
May 7, 2021 Filing 7 WAIVER of SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED: Waiver sent to All Defendants (Fitzpatrick, Bernard)
May 7, 2021 Filing 6 PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION and PROPOSED ORDER submitted by Teresa Vega for attorney Richard M. Paul, III to appear Pro Hac Vice. (Filing fee $ 225, receipt number 0972-9589696) (Fitzpatrick, Bernard)
April 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 PRO HAC VICE ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 4/28/2021 GRANTING #2 Application for Pro Hac Vice, Attorney Patrick O. Hotze, to appear for Teresa Vega. (Reader, L)
April 23, 2021 Filing 4 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Zignago, K.)
April 23, 2021 Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Sanofi US Services, Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *B. James Fitzpatrick* *Fitzpatrick & Swanston* *555 S. Main Street* *Salinas, CA 93901*. (Zignago, K.)
April 23, 2021 Filing 2 PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION and PROPOSED ORDER submitted by Teresa Vega. (Filing fee $ 225, receipt number 0972-9562223) (Fitzpatrick, B.)
April 23, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Teresa Vega. Attorney Fitzpatrick, B. James added. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0972-9562157) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Fitzpatrick, B.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vega v. Sanofi US Services, Inc., et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sanofi US Services, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Teresa Vega
Represented By: B. James Fitzpatrick
Represented By: Patrick O. Hotze, PHV
Represented By: Richard M. Paul, III, PHV
Represented By: Bernard J. Fitzpatrick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?