Gopal v. Luther et al
| Krishan K. Gopal |
| Kapil Luther, California Relief LLC and Brikena E. Luther |
| 2:2021cv00735 |
| April 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Carolyn K Delaney |
| Kimberly J Mueller |
| Contract: Recovery/Enforcement |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 REPLY by Brikena E. Luther, Kapil Luther re #4 Motion to Dismiss. (Mapes, Michael) |
| Filing 14 REPLY by Krishan K. Gopal to RESPONSE to #9 Motion to Remand. (Diamond, Craig) Modified on 5/19/2021 (Kaminski, H). |
| Filing 13 MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy C. Schultz for Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 5/19/2021: On the court's own motion and pursuant to Local Rule 230(g), Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss, or in the Alternative, Stay the Proceedings, ECF No. #4 , and Plaintiff's Motion to Remand, ECF No. #9 , are SUBMITTED without oral argument. The Motions are submitted on the briefs, including the reply briefs, if any, as provided by Local Rule 230(d). Accordingly, the hearing date of 5/28/2021 is VACATED. If the court determines that oral argument is needed, it will be scheduled at a later date. (Text Only Entry)(Schultz, C) |
| Filing 12 OPPOSITION by Brikena E. Luther, Kapil Luther to #9 Motion to Remand,. (Mapes, Michael) |
| Filing 11 OPPOSITION by Krishan K. Gopal to #4 Motion to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Fran Cole, #2 Declaration of Rakesh Rana, #3 Proof of Service)(Diamond, Craig) Modified on 5/10/2021 (Reader, L). |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE re #9 Motion to Remand. (Diamond, Craig) Modified on 4/30/2021 (Kennison, L). Modified on 5/5/2021 (Benson, A.). |
| Filing 9 MOTION to REMAND by Krishan K. Gopal. Attorney Diamond, Craig A. added. Motion Hearing set for 5/28/2021 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Motion, #2 Declaration Fran Cole, #3 Declaration Rakesh Rana, #4 Request for Judicial Notice)(Diamond, Craig) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of SERVICE of #4 Motion nd supporting documents by Brikena E. Luther, Kapil Luther . (Mapes, Michael) Modified on |
| Filing 7 MEMORANDUM by Brikena E. Luther, Kapil Luther in Support of #4 Motion to Dismiss. (Mapes, Michael) |
| Filing 6 DECLARATION of Michael C. Mapes in support of #4 Motion to Dismiss. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Declaration)(Mapes, Michael) |
| Filing 5 DECLARATION of Kapil Luther in support of #4 Motion to Dismiss. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Declaration)(Mapes, Michael) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to DISMISS by Brikena E. Luther, Kapil Luther. Motion Hearing set for 5/28/2021 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Mapes, Michael) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of SERVICE by Brikena E. Luther, Kapil Luther re #1 Notice of Removal,. (Mapes, Michael) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 9/2/2021 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Benson, A.) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Nevada County Superior Court, case number CU21-085321 by Kapil Uther, Brikena E. Luther. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0972-9560073). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Pleadings, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Mapes, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
