Ignacio Arzate-Reyes v. Monty Wilkinson et al
| Ignacio Arzate-Reyes |
| Alejandro Mayorkas, Merrick Garland, Corey A. Price and Tae Johnson |
| 2:2021cv00759 |
| April 28, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Gregory G Hollows |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 CASE TRANSFERRED IN from District of California Central; Case Number 2:21-cv-02374. |
Filing 10
ORDER by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank transferring case to Eastern District of California, Sacramento. Case transferred electronically. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (shb) [Transferred from cacd on 4/28/2021.]
|
| Filing 9 Joint STIPULATION for Order To Transfer Venue filed by Respondents Merrick Garland, Tae Johnson, Alejandro Mayorkas, Corey A. Price. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Osinoff, Joanne) [Transferred from cacd on 4/28/2021.] |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Joanne I Osinoff on behalf of Respondents Merrick Garland, Tae Johnson, Alejandro Mayorkas, Corey A. Price (Attorney Joanne I Osinoff added to party Merrick Garland(pty:res), Attorney Joanne I Osinoff added to party Tae Johnson(pty:res), Attorney Joanne I Osinoff added to party Alejandro Mayorkas(pty:res), Attorney Joanne I Osinoff added to party Corey A. Price(pty:res))(Osinoff, Joanne) [Transferred from cacd on 4/28/2021.] |
|
Filing 7
ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE TO PETITION (28 U.S.C. 2241) by Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. Respondent(s) may file and serve an Answer to the Petition not later than 5/6/2021. Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the United States Attorneys Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. Motions to Dismiss shall be filed by 4/21/2021. (Attachments: #1 Attach.1, #2 Attach.2) (es) [Transferred from cacd on 4/28/2021.]
|
| Filing 6 APPLICATION Civil Case Cover Sheet with filing fee previously paid (5.00 paid on 03/17/2021,, filed by Petitioner Ignacio Arzate-Reyes.(Wallen, Shannon) [Transferred from cacd on 4/28/2021.] |
|
Filing 5
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS Scheduling Mandatory Response to Prelim. Injunctive Relief Application and Petitioners Optional Reply by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank: The complaint is construed as containing a request for preliminary injunctive relief. No later than 11:59 p.m. on Wednesday, March 24, 2021, the respondents SHALL E-FILE a brief responding to petitioners request for preliminary injunctive relief. Respondents shall identify applicable non-merits bases for denying the request, such as non-compliance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or this Courts Local Civil Rules, in addition to addressing the merits. No later than 11:59 p.m. on Friday, April 2, 2021, petitioners counsel MAY E-FILE a reply or a notice stating that petitioner does not intend to file a reply. The Court deems this matter suitable for resolution without oral argument. See order for further details. (shb) [Transferred from cacd on 4/28/2021.]
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Jessica Smith Bobadilla on behalf on Petitioner. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (ghap) [Transferred from cacd on 4/28/2021.] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #1 . The following error(s) was found: The Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71)is missing or incomplete. All civil actions presented for filing must be accompanied by a completed Civil Cover Sheet. See Local Rule 3-1. Counsel must file a completed Civil Cover Sheet immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (ghap) [Transferred from cacd on 4/28/2021.] |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank and referred to Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (ghap) [Transferred from cacd on 4/28/2021.] |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in Federal Custody (28 USC 2241), Receipt No. ACACDC-30938558 for $5 filing fee, filed by Petitioner Ignacio Arzate-Reyes. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Ignacio Arzate, #2 Declaration Declaration of Jessica Bobadilla, #3 Exhibit Exhibits to Declarations and Habeas)(Wallen, Shannon) [Transferred from cacd on 4/28/2021.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
