Klinker et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
Michelle Klinker and David Klinker |
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson |
2:2021cv00817 |
May 4, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Kendall J Newman |
Troy L Nunley |
Tort Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendants Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson. (Wes, Joshua) |
Filing 6 ANSWER with Jury Demand by Johnson & Johnson.(Wes, Joshua) |
Filing 5 ANSWER with Jury Demand by Ethicon, Inc..(Wes, Joshua) |
Filing 4 STIPULATION to EXTEND TIME to respond to #1 Complaint by Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson. Attorney Wes, Joshua James added. (Wes, Joshua) Modified on 5/17/2021 (Coll, A). |
Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Benson, A.) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson * with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Wendy A. Mitchell* *Napoli Shkolnik PLLC* *400 Continental Blvd., 6th Floor* *El Segundo, CA 90245*. (Benson, A.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson by Michelle Klinker, David Klinker. Attorney Mitchell, Wendy Aline added. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0972-9581170) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Mitchell, Wendy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.