Ortega v. Chick-fil-A, Inc.
| Ronald Ortega |
| Chick-fil-A, Inc. |
| 2:2021cv00845 |
| May 10, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Carolyn K Delaney |
| Kimberly J Mueller |
| Troy L Nunley |
| Jeremy D Peterson |
| Constitutional - State Statute |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 PRO HAC VICE ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/8/2021 GRANTING #13 Application for Pro Hac Vice. Attorney Lindsey B. Mann, to appear for Chick-fil-A, Inc.(Reader, L) |
| Filing 15 PRO HAC VICE ORDER #14 signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/8/2021 ADDING Attorney Kathleen M. Campbell, PHV for Chick-fil-A, Inc.(Becknal, R) |
| Filing 14 PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION and PROPOSED ORDER submitted by Chick-fil-A, Inc. for attorney Kathleen M. Campbell to appear Pro Hac Vice. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Certificate of Good Standing)(Deagle, Wynter) [SEE #10 FOR PAYMENT] Modified on 5/27/2021 (Coll, A). |
| Filing 13 PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION and PROPOSED ORDER submitted by Chick-fil-A, Inc. for attorney Lindsey B. Mann to appear Pro Hac Vice. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Certificate of Good Standing)(Deagle, Wynter) [SEE #9 FOR PAYMENT] Modified on 5/27/2021 (Coll, A). |
| Filing 12 MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy C. Schultz for Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 5/25/2021: The Pro Hac Vice Application submitted by Defendant Chick-fil-A, Inc. for Attorney Kathleen M. Campbell, ECF No. #10 , is DENIED. The Application includes a Certificate of Good Standing by the State Bar of Georgia where Local Rule 180(b)(2) requires "a Certificate of Good Standing from the Court in the Attorneys State of Primary Practice." (Text Only Entry) (Schultz, C) |
| Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy C. Schultz for Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 5/25/2021: The Pro Hac Vice Application submitted by Defendant Chick-fil-A, Inc. for Attorney Lindsey B. Mann, ECF No. #9 , is DENIED. The Application includes a Certificate of Good Standing by the State Bar of Georgia where Local Rule 180(b)(2) requires "a Certificate of Good Standing from the Court in the Attorneys State of Primary Practice." (Text Only Entry) (Schultz, C) |
| Filing 10 PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION and PROPOSED ORDER submitted by Chick-fil-A, Inc. for attorney Kathleen M. Campbell to appear Pro Hac Vice. (Filing fee $ 225, receipt number 0972-9609971) (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Deagle, Wynter) |
| Filing 9 PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION and PROPOSED ORDER submitted by Chick-fil-A, Inc. for attorney Lindsey B. Mann to appear Pro Hac Vice. (Filing fee $ 225, receipt number 0972-9609963) (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Deagle, Wynter) |
| Filing 8 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 9/16/2021 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Coll, A) |
Filing 7
ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 5/17/2021 REASSIGNING CASE 2:21-cv-00845-TLN-JDP to Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller and Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney for all further proceedings and RELATING CASES 2:21-cv-00845-KJM-CKD and 2:21-cv-00839-KJM-CKD. New Case Number: 2:21-cv-00845-KJM-CKD. (Coll, A)
|
| Filing 6 PROPOSED ORDER to #5 Motion. (Deagle, Wynter) Modified on 5/13/2021 (Reader, L). |
| Filing 5 JOINT MOTION of ASSIGNMENT of CASE and WITHDRAWAL of #4 Request for Sanctions by Chick-fil-A, Inc. (Deagle, Wynter) Modified on 5/13/2021 (Reader, L). |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of RELATED CASE(S) 2:21-cv-00839 and MOTION for SANCTIONS by Ronald Ortega. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Sophia G. Gold, #2 Exhibit A)(Kaliel, Jeffrey) Modified on 5/17/2021 (Benson, A.). |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Benson, A.) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Chick-fil-A, Inc. (Deagle, Wynter) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Sacramento Superior Court, case number 34-2021-00296245 by Ronald Ortega. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0972-9593582) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration of Teddy Cravens, #2 Exhibit B - State Court Record, #3 Notice of Interested Parties/Disclosure Statement)(Deagle, Wynter) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ortega v. Chick-fil-A, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ronald Ortega | |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey Douglas Kaliel |
| Represented By: | Sophia Goren Gold |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Chick-fil-A, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Wynter L. Deagle |
| Represented By: | Kathleen M. Campbell, PHV |
| Represented By: | Lindsey B. Mann, PHV |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
