(PC) Brunsvik v. Magrini et al
Nicholas Craig Brunsvik |
Leonard, Johnson, Marlar, South and Eric Magrini |
2:2021cv00973 |
June 1, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Jeremy D Peterson |
William B Shubb |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY). This case has been assigned to Senior Judge William B. Shubb and Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson. The new case number is: 2:21-CV-973 WBS JDP. (Reader, L) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: [ 5 ] Clerk's Notice Reassigning Case served on Nicholas Craig Brunsvik. (Reader, L) |
Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Reader, L) |
Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 7/6/2021. (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Zignago, K.) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents served on Nicholas Craig Brunsvik. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Nicholas Craig Brunsvik. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against all Defendants by Nicholas Craig Brunsvik. (Zignago, K.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.