(PC) Richard v. Joseph et al
Plaintiff: Craig Richard
Defendant: Joseph and Spalding
Case Number: 2:2021cv00975
Filed: June 2, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Kendall J Newman
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 NOTICE OF INTENT TO WAIVE SERVICE by defendants: Joseph, Spaulding. AG Waiver of Service due in 30 days. (Becknal, R)
July 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER RE CONSENT OR REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/16/21. Consent or Decline due by 8/19/2021 (Plummer, M)
July 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Joseph, Spalding* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Craig Richard J-36916* *California Health Care Facility* *PO Box 213040* *Stockton, California, 95213*. (Plummer, M)
July 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 07/16/21 FINDING SERVICE OF COMPLAINT APPROPRIATE AND DIRECTING E-SERVICE on the following defendant(s): *Joseph*, *Spaulding*. Operative Complaint, Summons, Notice of E-Service Waiver and this Order served via email on CDCR. (Attachments: #1 CDCR Notice of Waiver) (Plummer, M)
July 16, 2021 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #10 Order Finding Service of Complaint Appropriate, served on Craig Richard. (Plummer, M)
July 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NOTICE on How to Proceed: Plaintiff opts to proceed with original complaint as screened by Craig Richard. (Huang, H)
July 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 DOCUMENT SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: #5 Motion to Proceed IFP served on CDCR. (Henshaw, R)
July 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/6/2021 DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Craig Richard. The custodial agency shall collect an initial partial filing fee and monthly payments in accordance with this order until the filing fee of $350 is paid in full. (cc: CDCR and Financial Department) (Henshaw, R)
July 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/6/2021 GRANTING #5 Motion to Proceed IFP; DISMISSING all claims but for the potentially colorable 8th Amendment claims against defendants Joseph and Spalding with leave to amend; GRANTING Plaintiff 30 days of service of this order to amend his complaint; and ORDERING if Plaintiff opts to proceed on his original complaint with the potentially cognizable 8th Amendment claims againsts defendant Joseph and Spalding, Plaintiff to return the attached notice within 30 days of service of this order. Plaintiff to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00. All fees to be collected and paid in accordance with this court's order to the CDCR filed concurrently herewith. (Henshaw, R)
July 6, 2021 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Order and #7 Order Directing Prisoner Payment served on Craig Richard. (Henshaw, R)
June 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Craig Richard. (Tupolo, A)
June 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Kastilahn, A)
June 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/9/2021 ORDERING Plaintiff to submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed IFP on the form provided by the Clerk or the required fees in the amount of $402.00. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner. (Henshaw, R)
June 9, 2021 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Order and IFP application served on Craig Richard. (Henshaw, R)
June 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; E-Filing Notice issued re complaint filed *6/2/2021*; Consent or Decline due by 7/6/2021 (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter, #2 E-Filing Notice) (Becknal, R)
June 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Craig Richard. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Becknal, R)
June 2, 2021 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #2 Prisoner New Case Documents served on Craig Richard. (Becknal, R)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (PC) Richard v. Joseph et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Craig Richard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joseph
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Spalding
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?