Martin v. Ball Corporation et al
| Richard Martin |
| Ball Metal Beverage Container Corp., Ball Corporation and Frank Bragger |
| 2:2021cv01049 |
| June 14, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Deborah Barnes |
| Morrison C England |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER (Text Only) issued by courtroom deputy for Senior District Judge, Morrison C. England, Jr.: Pursuant to the filing of the First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 7), Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 5), is DENIED as MOOT. On the Court's own motion and pursuant to Local Rule 230(g), the 9/23/2021 hearing on the Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint #8 is VACATED and SUBMITTED without appearance and argument. The opposition or statement of non-opposition and reply due dates shall be filed in accordance with the original motion hearing date. If the Court determines that oral argument is needed it will be scheduled at a later date. Any outstanding request for telephonic appearance is denied as moot. (Deutsch, S) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to DISMISS by Ball Corporation, Ball Metal Beverage Container Corp. Motion Hearing set for 9/23/2021 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before Senior Judge Morrison C. England Jr. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Request for Judicial Notice, #3 Proposed Order)(Cargain, Aaron) |
| Filing 7 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Richard Martin.(Lesches, Levi) |
| Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER (Text Only) issued by courtroom deputy for Senior District Judge, Morrison C. England, Jr.: On the Court's own motion and pursuant to Local Rule 230(g), the 8/26/2021 hearing on the Amended Motion to Dismiss #5 is VACATED and SUBMITTED without appearance and argument. The opposition or statement of non-opposition and reply due dates shall be filed in accordance with the original motion hearing date. If the Court determines that oral argument is needed it will be scheduled at a later date. Any outstanding request for telephonic appearance is denied as moot. (Deutsch, S) |
| Filing 5 AMENDED #4 MOTION to DISMISS by Ball Corporation, Ball Metal Beverage Container Corp. Motion Hearing set for 8/26/2021 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Request for Judicial Notice, #3 Proposed Order)(Cargain, Aaron) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to DISMISS by Ball Corporation, Ball Metal Beverage Container Corp..Motion Hearing set for 8/26/2021 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Request for Judicial Notice, #3 Proposed Order)(Cargain, Aaron) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of SERVICE by Ball Corporation, Ball Metal Beverage Container Corp. re #2 Civil New Case Documents for MCE. Attorney Cargain, Aaron Michael added. (Cargain, Aaron) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Becknal, R) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Solano County Superior Court, case number FCS055690 by Ball Corporation and Ball Metal Beverage Container Corp. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0972-9650665) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Declaration of Jason A. Geller, #3 Ball Corporation 7.1 Disclosure Statement, #4 Ball Metal Beverage Container Corp. 7.1 Disclosure Statement)(Geller, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
