Green v. U.S. Postal Service et al
| Renessa Green |
| County of Solano, City of Vallejo and United States Postal Service |
| 2:2021cv01154 |
| June 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Allison Claire |
| Troy L Nunley |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| RECEIPT number #CAE200116020 $250.00 fbo Daniel Azizi by Downtown LA Law Group on 8/17/2021. (Kaminski, H) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy M. Krueger for District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 8/10/2021: Pursuant to the Notice of Dismissal (ECF No. #6 ) and FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(i), this case is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. The Order to Show Cause (ECF No. 5) is DISCHARGED. CASE CLOSED. (Text Only Entry) (Krueger, M) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL by Renessa Green. Attorney McBratney, Darren added. (McBratney, Darren) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy M. Krueger for District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 8/6/2021: Plaintiff's Counsel was ordered to file a response to the Court's 7/23/2021 Order to Show Cause (ECF No. 4) by 8/5/2021 for Plaintiff's failure to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. #3 ). To date, a response has not been filed. Accordingly, the Counsel for Plaintiff, Daniel Azizi, shall pay sanctions in the amount of $250.00. The sum is to be paid personally by Counsel not later than twenty-one (21) days from the filing of this Order. The Court will grant Plaintiff one more opportunity to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss no later than 8/19/2021. Defendant shall have until 8/26/2021 to file a reply. The motion will then stand SUBMITTED. Accordingly, the hearing set for 8/19/2021 is VACATED. (TEXT ONLY ENTRY) (Krueger, M) |
| Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy M. Krueger for District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 7/23/2021 ORDERING the hearing on Defendant United States Postal Service's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. #3 ) CONTINUED to 8/19/2021 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 2 before District Judge Troy L. Nunley. Counsel for Plaintiff is ORDERED to SHOW CAUSE, in writing, no later than 8/5/2021 as to why he should not be sanctioned in the amount of $250 for failure to timely file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to that motion, pursuant to Local Rule 230(c). Plaintiff shall file an opposition to the motion, or statement of non-opposition by 8/5/2021. Failure to file an opposition to the motion will be deemed a statement of non-opposition thereto and may result in a recommendation that Defendant's motion be granted. Defendant may file a reply to Plaintiff's opposition, if any, by 8/12/2021. (TEXT ONLY ENTRY) (Krueger, M) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to DISMISS by United States Postal Service. Motion Hearing set for 8/5/2021 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Proof of Service)(Davidson, Rachel) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Kastilahn, A) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Solano County Superior Court, case number FCS056111 by USPS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Davidson, Rachel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
