Harris et al v. Snapple Beverage Corp. et al
Darlene Harris, Annemarie Newbold and Stephanie Escobar |
Keurig Dr. Pepper Inc. and Snapple Beverage Corp. |
2:2021cv01164 |
June 30, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Morrison C England |
Jeremy D Peterson |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 ORDER signed by Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 8/17/2021 GRANTING #9 Application for Pro Hac Vice. Added attorney Charles Sipos, PHV for Keurig Dr. Pepper Inc. & Snapple Beverage Corp. The Pro Hac Vice attorney is directed to request electronic filing access through PACER. (Coll, A) |
Filing 16 ORDER signed by Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 8/17/2021 GRANTING #8 Application for Pro Hac Vice. Added attorney Lauren Watts Staniar, PHV for Keurig Dr. Pepper Inc. and Snapple Beverage Corp. The Pro Hac Vice attorney is directed to request electronic filing access through PACER. (Coll, A) |
Filing 15 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 08/10/21 ORDERING that Defendants shall respond to the Complaint by 09/10/21; Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is due 09/10/21 with plaintiffs' opposition due 10/01/21 and defendants' reply due 10/12/21. (Benson, A.) |
Filing 14 MINUTE ORDER (Text Only) issued by courtroom deputy for Senior District Judge, Morrison C. England, Jr.: The Court received the Pro Hac Vice Applications and Proposed Orders (ECF No. 8 and 9). Pursuant to Local Rule 137(b), regarding the requirements for proper filing of a proposed order, you are required to email the proposed order (in Microsoft Word) to chambers in addition to filing the pdf version via the CM/ECF system. Pursuant to Local Rules 101 and 131(c), the definition for "signature", you may enter /s/ for signatures for all counsel. Please submit your proposed order today in Microsoft Word format to: mceorders@caed.uscourts.gov. (Deutsch, S) |
Filing 13 JOINT STATEMENT of Regarding Case Type filed by Plaintiffs Stephanie Escobar, Darlene Harris, Annemarie Newbold. (Hart, Yana) |
Filing 12 MINUTE ORDER (Text Only) issued by courtroom deputy for Senior District Judge, Morrison C. England, Jr.: The Court received the Stipulation and Proposed Order for Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint filed at ECF No. #11 . Pursuant to Local Rule 137(b), regarding the requirements for proper filing of a proposed order, you are required to email the proposed order (in Microsoft Word) to chambers in addition to filing the pdf version via the CM/ECF system. Pursuant to Local Rules 101 and 131(c), the definition for "signature", you may enter /s/ for signatures for all counsel. Please submit your proposed order today in Microsoft Word format to: mceorders@caed.uscourts.gov. On the Court's own motion, the Motion for Extension of Time at ECF No. #7 is STRICKEN. (Deutsch, S) |
Filing 11 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Extension of Time to Respond to #1 Complaint, by Keurig Dr. Pepper Inc., Snapple Beverage Corp. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Biderman, David) Modified on 7/28/2021 (Huang, H). |
Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER (Text Only) issued by courtroom deputy for Senior District Judge, Morrison C. England, Jr.: After review of the Motion for Extension of Time (ECF No. 7), the parties are directed to file a stipulation and proposed order or notice the motion in compliance with Local Rule 230(a). Available civil law and motion calendar dates can be found on the Court's website at www.caed.uscourts.gov by following these menu options: Judges/All Judges/ United States District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. (MCE)/Standard Information (under the Case Management Procedures). Reservation of a hearing date is not required. All hearings are at 2:00 p.m. in courtroom 7. (Deutsch, S) |
Filing 9 PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION and PROPOSED ORDER submitted by Keurig Dr. Pepper Inc., Snapple Beverage Corp. for attorney Charles C. Sipos to appear Pro Hac Vice. Attorney Sipos, PHV, Charles added. (Filing fee $ 225, receipt number ACAEDC-9729736) (Sipos, PHV, Charles) |
Filing 8 PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION and PROPOSED ORDER submitted by Keurig Dr. Pepper Inc., Snapple Beverage Corp. for attorney Lauren Watts Staniar to appear Pro Hac Vice. Attorney Staniar, Lauren Watts added. (Filing fee $ 225, receipt number ACAEDC-9729718) (Staniar, Lauren) |
Filing 7 MOTION for EXTENSION of TIME to file answer to #1 Complaint, by Keurig Dr. Pepper Inc., Snapple Beverage Corp. Attorney Biderman, David T. added. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Biderman, David) Modified on 7/20/2021 (Mena-Sanchez, L). |
Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendants. (Biderman, David) Modified on 7/20/2021 (Mena-Sanchez, L). |
Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Snapple Beverage Corp. served on 7/2/2021. (Hart, Yana) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Keurig Dr. Pepper Inc. served on 7/6/2021. (Hart, Yana) |
Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Coll, A) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Keurig Dr. Pepper Inc., Snapple Beverage Corp.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Yana A. Hart* *Clarkson Law Firm PC* *22525 Pacific Coast Highway* *Malibu, CA 90265*. (Coll, A) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against all defendants by all plaintiffs. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0972-9678326) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Declaration of Annemarie Newbold, #3 Declaration of Stephanie Escobar, #4 Declaration of Darlene Harris)(Hart, Yana) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.