Marymee et al v. Ford Motor Company
| Terry Marymee and Daisy Marymee |
| Ford Motor Company |
| 2:2021cv01219 |
| July 9, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Dennis M Cota |
| Troy L Nunley |
| Contract Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 21
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 4/15/2022. (Coll, A)
|
| Filing 20 STIPULATION and PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER for Discovery Issues by Ford Motor Company. Attorney Won, Jonathan added. (Won, Jonathan) |
|
Filing 19
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 3/2/2022 GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART #8 Motion for Protective Order. The Court sua sponte extends the date for completion of non-expert discovery to 5/1/2022. In all other respects, the Court's 7/12/2021, scheduling order remains in full force and effect. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing 18
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 2/16/22 GRANTING Defendant's application to appear telephonically for the Motion for Protective Order hearing on 2/16/22, in Courtroom 304, 3rd Floor, of the above-referenced Court, at 10:00 a.m. Counsel shall arrange an appearance through Court Call.(Kastilahn, A)
|
| Filing 17 MINUTES (Text Only) for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota: MOTION HEARING held on 2/16/2022. Formal order to issue. Plaintiffs' Counsel Anna Galaviz specially appearing for David Barry present. Defendant's Counsel Brian Vanderhoff present through CourtCall. (Pine, C) |
| Filing 16 REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE at the 2/16/2022 Motion hearing re #8 Motion for Protective Order filed by Ford Motor Company by Ford Motor Company. (Vanderhoof, Brian) |
| Filing 15 REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE at the 2/16/2022 Motion hearing re #8 Motion for Protective Order filed by Ford Motor Company by Ford Motor Company. (Vanderhoof, Brian) |
| Filing 14 STATEMENT re: Discovery Disagreement filed by Plaintiffs Daisy Marymee, Terry Marymee. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3)(Barry, David) |
| Filing 13 STATEMENT re: Discovery Disagreement filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Brian C. Vanderhoof)(Vanderhoof, Brian) |
| Filing 12 OPPOSITION by Terry Marymee to #8 Motion for Protective Order. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Barry, David) Modified on 2/3/2022 (Kaminski, H). |
|
Filing 11
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 01/12/2022 CONTINUING the Hearing on #8 Motion for Protective Order to 2/16/2022 at 10:00 AM in Redding (DMC) before Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota. (Rodriguez, E)
|
| Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy C. Pine for Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 1/12/2021: (Text Only Entry) An in-person hearing has been set in this matter. All parties are advised, pursuant to Eastern District of California General Order No. 638, issued on November 2, 2021, that any individuals wishing to appear in person must be fully vaccinated against COVID-19. "Fully vaccinated" means two weeks have passed since the second dose of a two-dose COVID-19 vaccine or since the single dose of a one-dose COVID-19 vaccine. Proof of vaccination must be submitted to the Clerk of the Court at least five (5) days prior to the scheduled hearing. To submit proof of vaccination, visit www.caed.uscourts.gov and click on "COVID-19" Vaccination Submission." Individuals who are not fully vaccinated will need to contact the Court, no later than five (5) days prior to the hearing, regarding the availability of alternatives to appearing in person.(Pine, C) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE to RESCHEDULE HEARING on #8 Motion for Protective Order : Motion Hearing RESET for 2/9/2022 at 10:00 AM in Redding (DMC) before Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota. (Efstratis, Harry) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for PROTECTIVE ORDER to Limit the Scope of the Deposition of Ford Motor Company's F.R.C.P. 30(B)(6) Representative by Ford Motor Company. Attorney Efstratis, Harry Paul added. Motion Hearing set for 2/9/2021 at 09:30 AM in Redding before Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota. (Efstratis, Harry) Modified on 1/3/2022 (Benson, A.). |
| Filing 7 JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT by Terry Marymee. (Barry, David) Modified on 10/18/2021 (Coll, A). |
| Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Barry, David) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF LODGING DOCUMENT(S) ELECTRONICALLY by Ford Motor Company: Answer of Defendant Ford Motor Company to Plaintiffs' Unverified Complaint. (Vanderhoof, Brian) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of SERVICE by Ford Motor Company re #3 Civil New Case Documents for TLN. (Vanderhoof, Brian) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Huang, H) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Ford Motor Company. (Vanderhoof, Brian) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Tehama County Superior Court, case number 21CI-000130 by Ford Motor Company. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-9700566) (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service, #2 Declaration of Brian C. Vanderhoof, #3 Declaration of Jonathan Won, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Vanderhoof, Brian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
