Guidry v. Grauman et al
David Guidry |
Daniel Grauman, Sean McPherson, Jeremiah Skaggs and City of Stockton |
2:2021cv01238 |
July 14, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Troy L Nunley |
Jeremy D Peterson |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *City of Stockton* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Patrick Matthew Buelna* *1901 Harrison St.* *Suite 1140* *Oakland, CA 94612*. (Coll, A) |
Filing 7 ANSWER with Jury Demand by Daniel Grauman, Sean McPherson, Jeremiah Skaggs. Attorney Ghannam, Jamil Radwan added.(Ghannam, Jamil) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: All Defendants. (Buelna, Patrick) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Patrick Matthew Buelna on behalf of David Guidry. (Buelna, Patrick) |
Filing 4 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Becknal, R) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Daniel Grauman, Sean McPherson, Jeremiah Skaggs* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Patrick Matthew Buelna* *Pointer & Buelna, LLP* *1901 Harrison Street, Suite 1140* *Oakland, CA 94612*. (Becknal, R) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by David Guidry (Buelna, Patrick) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by David Guidry. Attorney Buelna, Patrick Matthew added. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-9710513) (Buelna, Patrick) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.