Mlodzianowski v. Markus
Plaintiff: Joseph Mlodzianowski
Defendant: Brian Markus
Case Number: 2:2021cv01295
Filed: July 23, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Deborah Barnes
Referring Judge: John A Mendez
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 17, 2021 Filing 19 MINUTE ORDER: The parties are ORDERED to file an updated Joint Status Report pursuant to the provisions of F.R.Cv.P. 16 and 26, in accordance with Local Rule 240 and the Court's Order Requiring Service of Process and Joint Status Report, within 30 days of the Western District of Texas's ruling on Plaintiff's pending Motion for Reconsideration. [TEXT ENTRY ONLY] (Michel, G.)
September 17, 2021 Filing 18 JOINT STATUS REPORT by Joseph Mlodzianowski. (Wong, Christina)
September 17, 2021 Filing 17 ANSWER with Jury Demand by Brian Markus.(Leventhal, Joseph)
August 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER GRANTING #14 Application for Pro Hac Vice signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 08/20/21. Added attorney Brendan D. Cook, PHV for Joseph Mlodzianowski. The Pro Hac Vice attorney is directed to request electronic filing access through PACER. (Benson, A.)
August 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER GRANTING #13 Application for Pro Hac Vice. signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 08/20/21. Added attorney Courtney E. Giles, PHV for Joseph Mlodzianowski. The Pro Hac Vice attorney is directed to request electronic filing access through PACER. (Benson, A.)
August 20, 2021 Filing 14 PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION and PROPOSED ORDER submitted by Joseph Mlodzianowski for attorney Brendan D. Cook to appear Pro Hac Vice. (Filing fee $ 225, receipt number ACAEDC-9776124) (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Wong, Christina)
August 20, 2021 Filing 13 PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION and PROPOSED ORDER submitted by Joseph Mlodzianowski for attorney Courtney E. Giles to appear Pro Hac Vice. Attorney Wong, Christina Meion added. (Filing fee $ 225, receipt number ACAEDC-9776106) (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Wong, Christina)
August 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER SUBSTITUTING ATTORNEY signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 8/17/2021 ADDING Joseph S. Leventhal for Brian Markus in place of attorney Katherine Patrice Chiarello, PHV. (Tupolo, A)
August 17, 2021 Filing 11 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Leventhal, Joseph)
August 17, 2021 Filing 10 SUBSTITUTION of ATTORNEY - PROPOSED, submitted by Brian Markus. (Leventhal, Joseph)
August 11, 2021 Filing 9 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 Order re Filing Requirements, #3 VDRP) (Martin-Gill, S)
August 11, 2021 Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE directing Attorneys: Brendan D. Cook, Courtney E. Giles & Katherine Patrice Chiarello to submit attached Pro Hac Vice Application. (Martin-Gill, S)
July 23, 2021 Filing 7 CASE TRANSFERRED IN from District of Texas Western; Case Number 5:20-cv-01142.
July 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER --IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants Motion to Transfer Venue (docket no. 2) is GRANTED, and Cause No. SA-20-cv-01142-OLG, Joseph Mlodzianowski v. Brian Markus, is hereby TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento Division, where the Clerk of the Court shall reassign this case to a district judge within that division. Signed by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (mgr) [Transferred from txwd on 7/23/2021.]
July 21, 2021 Case transferred to District of ED/CA, Sacramento Division; (mgr) [Transferred from txwd on 7/23/2021.]
November 2, 2020 Filing 5 REPLY to Response to Motion, filed by Brian Markus, re #2 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and Improper Venue, or Alternatively, Motion to Transfer filed by Defendant Brian Markus (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Chiarello, Katherine) [Transferred from txwd on 7/23/2021.]
October 26, 2020 Filing 4 PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE to Motion, filed by Joseph Mlodzianowski, re #2 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and Improper Venue, or Alternatively, Motion to Transfer filed by Defendant Brian Markus (mgr) [Transferred from txwd on 7/23/2021.]
October 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Text Order GRANTING #3 Unopposed Motion for Leave to File to File Response. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in accordance with Rule CV-7 of the Local Court Rules of the Western District of Texas, the clerk promptly file Plaintiffs Response in Opposition to Defendant Brian Markuss Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and Improper Venue, or Alternatively, Motion to Transfer, which was attached to the Motion for Leave as Appendix A entered by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ju) [Transferred from txwd on 7/23/2021.]
October 23, 2020 Filing 3 Unopposed MOTION for Leave to File Response in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Improper Venue, or Alternatively, Motion to Transfer by Joseph Mlodzianowski. (Attachments: #1 Appendix A, #2 Proposed Order)(Cook, Brendan) [Transferred from txwd on 7/23/2021.]
October 2, 2020 Filing 2 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and Improper Venue, or Alternatively, Motion to Transfer by Brian Markus. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Proposed Order)(Chiarello, Katherine) [Transferred from txwd on 7/23/2021.]
September 25, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Brian Markus (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0542-14007488), filed by Brian Markus. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Supplement)(Chiarello, Katherine) [Transferred from txwd on 7/23/2021.]
September 25, 2020 Case assigned to Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (mgr) [Transferred from txwd on 7/23/2021.]
September 25, 2020 If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Bemporad (mgr) [Transferred from txwd on 7/23/2021.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mlodzianowski v. Markus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joseph Mlodzianowski
Represented By: Brendan D. Cook
Represented By: Courtney E. Giles
Represented By: Brendan Donald Cook, PHV
Represented By: Courtney E. Giles, PHV
Represented By: Christina Meion Wong
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brian Markus
Represented By: Katherine Patrice Chiarello
Represented By: Joseph S. Leventhal
Represented By: Katherine Patrice Chiarello, PHV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?