Barnhart v. California Physicians' Service
| Tori Barnhart |
| California Physicians' Service Doing business as Blue Shield of California |
| 2:2021cv01384 |
| August 4, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Deborah Barnes |
| Kimberly J Mueller |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 151 Labor: Review of Agency Action |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 01/14/22. (Benson, A.)
|
| Filing 11 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Protective Order for Standard Litigation by Tori Barnhart. (Vandall, Matthew) |
| Filing 10 MINUTES for Scheduling Conference held via videoconference before Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 12/16/2021, and FRCP 16 BENCH ORDER: Plaintiff's Counsel, Matthew Vandall, present. Defendant's Counsel, Stephanie Roeser, present. The court and counsel discussed case scheduling. After careful consideration of the parties' comments, the court ORDERED the following pre-trial case schedule: Any amended complaint shall be filed (and any additional parties joined) by 1/28/2022; Initial disclosures as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a) shall be completed by 2/16/2022; fact discovery shall be completed by 3/24/2023; expert disclosures shall be completed by 4/25/2023; rebuttal expert witnesses shall be exchanged by 5/16/2023; all expert discovery shall be completed by 6/16/2023; and all dispositive motions, except for motions for continuances, temporary restraining orders or other emergency applications, shall be heard by 6/14/2023. Motions regarding discovery shall be noticed before the Magistrate Judge, as provided by Local Rule 302(c). The parties are directed to file a proposed discovery-only protective order within fourteen (14) days. The court approved the parties' agreement regarding the depositions of plaintiff and the defendant's 30(b)(6) representative, as well as their agreement regarding interrogatories, as memorialized in the parties' joint status report. After consideration of the parties' comments related to settlement, the parties will notify the court whether they request a court settlement conference date or referral to the Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program (VDRP) by the close of fact discovery. The parties shall file said notification or request for referral jointly, in writing. This case schedule will become final without further order of the court unless objections are filed within fourteen (14) calendar days of this order. The schedule, once final, shall not be modified except by leave of court upon showing of good cause. All provisions of the court's standing scheduling order for Civil Cases filed concurrently herewith are incorporated therein. SO ORDERED. Court Reporter: Tiphanne Crowe. (Text Only Entry) (Kennison, L) |
| Filing 9 JOINT STATUS REPORT by California Physicians' Service. (Roeser, Stephanie) |
| Filing 8 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendant California Physicians' Service. (Roeser, Stephanie) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER by California Physicians' Service.(Roeser, Stephanie) |
|
Filing 6
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 11/10/2021 EXTENDING Blue Shield's deadline to answer the Complaint to 11/15/2021. (Rodriguez, E)
|
| Filing 5 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Deadline to Answer #1 Complaint by California Physicians' Service. Attorney Roeser, Stephanie Anne added. (Roeser, Stephanie) Modified on 11/9/2021 (Coll, A). |
| Filing 4 WAIVER of SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED: Waiver sent to California Physicians' Service on 9/7/2021, Answer due 11/8/2021 (Vandall, Matthew) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 12/16/2021 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Reader, L) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *California Physicians' Service* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Matthew Vandall* *Winer Burritt & Scott, LLP* *1999 Harrison Street, Suite 600* *Oakland, California 94612*. (Reader, L) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Damages against California Physicians' Service by Tori Barnhart. Attorney Vandall, Matthew P. added. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-9746930) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Vandall, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Barnhart v. California Physicians' Service | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tori Barnhart | |
| Represented By: | Matthew P. Vandall |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: California Physicians' Service Doing business as Blue Shield of California | |
| Represented By: | Stephanie Anne Roeser |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
