Krueger v. Advent Health System/West
| Carrie Krueger |
| Feather River Health Clinic and Advent Health System/West Doing business as Feather River Health Clinic |
| 2:2021cv01549 |
| August 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Dennis M Cota |
| John A Mendez |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Advent Health System/West* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Andrew R. Kislik* *Nassiri & Jung LLP* *1700 Montgomery St., Suite 207* *San Francisco, CA 94111*. (Benson, A.) |
| Filing 5 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Advent Health System/West by Carrie Krueger.(Kislik, Andrew) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 Order re Filing Requirements, #3 VDRP) (Benson, A.) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Feather River Health Clinic* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Andrew R. Kislik* *Nassiri & Jung LLP* *1700 Montgomery St., Suite 207* *San Francisco, CA 94111*. (Benson, A.) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Carrie Krueger (Kislik, Andrew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Feather River Health Clinic by Carrie Krueger. Attorney Kislik, Andrew R. added. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-9790676) (Kislik, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
