(PC) Melger v. Sacramento Sheriff Department
| Thomas Joseph Melger |
| Sacramento Sheriff Department |
| 2:2021cv01611 |
| September 9, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Allison Claire |
| William B Shubb |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 10/5/2021 ADOPTING #5 Findings and Recommendations; DENYING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP; and DIRECTING plaintiff to submit the $402 filing fee within 30 days after being served with this order or face dismissal of the case. (Coll, A)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #8 Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations served on Thomas Joseph Melger. (Coll, A)
|
|
Filing 7
OBJECTIONS to #5 Findings and Recommendations by Plaintiff Thomas Joseph Melger. (Coll, A)
|
|
Filing 6
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Huang, H)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 09/16/21 ORDERING the Clerk of Court shall randomly assign a U.S. District Judge to this action. Also, RECOMMENDING that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis #2 be denied and plaintiff be ordered to pay the entire $402.00 in required fees within 30 days or face dismissal of the case. Motion #2 assigned and referred to Judge William B. Shubb. Objections due within 14 days.(Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing 4
CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY). This case has been assigned to Senior Judge William B. Shubb and Magistrate Judge Allison Claire. The new case number is: 2:21-cv-1611 WBS AC (PC). (Plummer, M)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #5 Order,, Findings and Recommendations (Motion), served on Thomas Joseph Melger. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing 3
PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 10/15/2021 (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Becknal, R)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents served on Thomas Joseph Melger. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Thomas Joseph Melger. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing 1
PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Sacramento Sheriff Department by Thomas Joseph Melger.(Becknal, R)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: (PC) Melger v. Sacramento Sheriff Department | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Thomas Joseph Melger | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Sacramento Sheriff Department | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
