(PS) Conerly et al v. Yang et al
| Carina Conerly and M.T. |
| Yee Yang, Caroline Wenzel Elementary School, Sharif Roldan Tarpin, Julie G. Yap, Sacramento Superior Court and Sacramento County Unified School District |
| 2:2021cv01618 |
| September 10, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Deborah Barnes |
| William B Shubb |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
EX PARTE APPLICATION by Carina Conerly for Emergency Order granting Carina Conerly sole legal and physical custody of minor M.T.. (Tupolo, A)
|
|
Filing 4
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Carina Conerly.(Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing 3
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Court Action Required. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Carina Conerly. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Carina Conerly. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kastilahn, A)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
