Hansen v. Ford Motor Company
| Alexander Hansen |
| Ford Motor Company |
| 2:2021cv01668 |
| September 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Deborah Barnes |
| William B Shubb |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER (TEXT ONLY): Pursuant to the #8 Joint Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice filed 8/30/2022, THIS ACTION IS TERMINATED, and all pending dates and deadlines are VACATED. CASE CLOSED. (Kirksey Smith, K) |
| Filing 8 STIPULATION for Dismissal with Prejudice Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) by Ford Motor Company. (Sullivan, Taylor) |
Filing 7
STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 1/13/2022 VACATING the 1/18/2022 Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference and ORDERING: Initial Disclosures served by 2/1/2022, Expert Disclosure due by 2/11/2022, Rebuttal Expert Disclosure due by 4/12/2022, Discovery completed by 5/12/2022, Motions filed by 6/24/2022, Final Pretrial Conference set for 9/12/2022 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb, and Jury Trial set for 11/15/2022 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb.(Huang, H)
|
| Filing 6 JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT by Ford Motor Company. (Sullivan, Taylor) |
| Filing 5 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Barry, David) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 1/18/2022 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Rodriguez, E) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of SERVICE by Ford Motor Company re #1 Notice of Removal,. (Sullivan, Taylor) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Ford Motor Company. (Sullivan, Taylor) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Sacramento Superior Court, case number 34-2021-00303438 by Ford Motor Company (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-9819712) (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Taylor F. Sulivan, #2 Declaration of H. Paul Efstratis, #3 Certificate of Service, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sullivan, Taylor) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hansen v. Ford Motor Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Alexander Hansen | |
| Represented By: | David N. Barry |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Ford Motor Company | |
| Represented By: | Taylor Sullivan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
