Farrell et al v. New Millennium Concepts, LTD
| Tara Farrell, Henly Velarde and Douglas Wells |
| New Millennium Concepts, LTD |
| 2:2021cv01691 |
| September 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| John A Mendez |
| Jeremy D Peterson |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendant New Millennium Concepts, LTD. (Jacobs, Michelle) |
| Filing 13 MOTION to DISMISS by New Millennium Concepts, LTD. Motion Hearing set for 1/25/2022 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Jacobs, Michelle) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to CHANGE VENUE by New Millennium Concepts, LTD. Motion Hearing set for 1/25/2022 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Declaration of Shawn Elliott, #2 Exhibit 1-A, #3 Exhibit 1-B, #4 Exhibit 1-C, #5 Proposed Order)(Jacobs, Michelle) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to DISMISS for LACK of JURISDICTION by New Millennium Concepts, LTD. Motion Hearing set for 1/25/2022 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Declaration of Shawn Elliott, #2 Exhibit 1-A, #3 Exhibit 1-B, #4 Exhibit 1-C, #5 Proposed Order)(Jacobs, Michelle) |
Filing 10
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 11/04/2021 GRANTING #8 Application for Pro Hac Vice. Added attorney Michelle C. Jacobs, PHV for New Millennium Concepts, LTD. The Pro Hac Vice attorney is directed to request electronic filing access through PACER. (Rodriguez, E)
|
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF GOOD STANDING re #8 Pro Hac Vice Application and Proposed Order by New Millennium Concepts, LTD. (Erickson, Mark) Modified on 11/4/2021 (Michel, G.). |
| Filing 8 PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION and PROPOSED ORDER submitted by New Millennium Concepts, LTD for attorney Michelle C. Jacobs to appear Pro Hac Vice. (Filing fee $ 225, receipt number ACAEDC-9912208) (Erickson, Mark) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER SUBSTITUTING ATTORNEY signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 11/2/2021 SUBSTITUTING Mark David Erickson for New Millennium Concepts, LTD in place of attorney Richard Thaddeus Behrens. (Huang, H)
|
| Filing 6 SUBSTITUTION of ATTORNEY - PROPOSED, submitted by New Millennium Concepts, LTD. (Erickson, Mark) |
| Filing 5 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME to respond to the #1 Complaint by New Millennium Concepts, LTD. Attorney Behrens, Richard Thaddeus ADDED. (Behrens, Richard) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: New Millennium Concepts, LTD served on 9/23/2021, answer due 10/14/2021. (Bruce, Katherine) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 Order re Filing Requirements, #3 VDRP) (Huang, H) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *New Millennium Concepts, LTD* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Katherine A. Bruce* *Clarkson Law Firm* *22525 Pacific Coast Highway* *Malibu, CA 90265*. (Huang, H) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against New Millennium Concepts, LTD by Tara Farrell, Henly Velarde, Douglas Wells. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-9823341) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Civil Cover Sheet)(Bruce, Katherine) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
