(PS)Jones v. Velocity Technology Solutions et al
| Garrison Jones |
| Velocity Technology Solutions and Navisite LLC |
| 2:2021cv01772 |
| September 28, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| John A Mendez |
| Jeremy D Peterson |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1962 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
REPLY by Navisite LLC, Velocity Technology Solutions re #6 Motion to Dismiss,. (DeCristoforo, Anthony)
|
|
MAIL RETURNED as Undeliverable, attempted, not known: 7 Minute Order sent to Garrison Jones. Notice of Change of Address due by 1/31/2022. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing 10
MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy N. Cannarozzi: Defts' motion to dismiss #6 , presently calendared for hearing on 12/2/2021, is ordered submitted without appearance and without argument pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). The 12/2/2021 hearing date is VACATED. If the court subsequently concludes that oral argument is necessary, a hearing will be set and the parties notified accordingly. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 11/15/2021. (Text Only Entry)(Cannarozzi, N)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: 10 Minute Order served on Garrison Jones. (Cannarozzi, N)
|
|
Filing 9
OPPOSITION to #6 Motion to Dismiss, by Garrison Jones. (Huang, H)
|
|
Filing 8
AMENDED NOTICE OF HEARING by Defendants RE #6 Motion to Dismiss. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(DeCristoforo, Anthony) Modified on 10/25/2021 (Mena-Sanchez, L).
|
|
Filing 7
MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy N. Cannarozzi for Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 10/21/2021: The 11/22/2021 hearing re: Defendants' Motion to Dismiss #6 is VACATED. The date selected by defense counsel does not comply with the court's scheduled law and motion calendar. Counsel is directed to contact Courtroom Deputy N. Cannarozzi for available hearing dates. (Text Only Entry)(Cannarozzi, N)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION to DISMISS by Defendants. Attorney DeCristoforo, Anthony J. added. Motion Hearing SET for 11/22/2021 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 9 (JDP) before Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(DeCristoforo, Anthony) Modified on 10/25/2021 (Mena-Sanchez, L).
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: 7 Minute Order served on Garrison Jones. (Cannarozzi, N)
|
|
Filing 5
SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Navisite LLC served on 9/30/2021, Velocity Technology Solutions served on 9/30/2021. (Huang, H)
|
|
Filing 4
EXHIBITS of Fraud and Forgery by Garrison Jones. (Huang, H)
|
|
Filing 3
CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED Initial Scheduling Conference SET for 3/3/2022 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 9 (JDP) before Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 Pro Se Informational Order) (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing 2
SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Navisite LLC, Velocity Technology Solutions* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Garrison Jones* *P.O. Box 188911* *Sacramento, CA 95818*. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Navisite LLC, Velocity Technology Solutions by Garrison Jones. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Civil New Case Documents for JAM, #2 Summons served on Garrison Jones. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
RECEIPT number #CAE200116797 $402.00 by Garrison Jones on 9/28/2021. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
