(PC) Welk v. California Department of Corrections et al
| Richard James Welk |
| California Department of Corrections, Rosemary Ndoh, D. Crenshaw, L. Young, Gassaway, Estrada, Tom Tanprasert, T. Wolfe, Stephen Hitchman, Nancy Seigrist and David L. Groves |
| 2:2021cv01786 |
| September 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Edmund F Brennan |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER for INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:21-cv-1786 EFB) to Fresno 1:21-cv-1476 JLT) signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/01/21.(Plummer, M)
|
| Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; E-Filing Notice issued re complaint filed *9/29/2021*; Consent or Decline due by 11/4/2021. (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter, #2 E-Filing Notice) (Kastilahn, A) |
| SERVICE BY EMAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Richard James Welk. (Kastilahn, A) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Richard James Welk. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kastilahn, A) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Richard James Welk. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kastilahn, A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
