Castro v. Nike, Inc.
Lisa Castro |
Nike, Inc. |
2:2021cv01808 |
September 30, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Morrison C England |
Jeremy D Peterson |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 11/18/21 EXTENDING time for defendant to respond to Complaint to 01/10/22; Plaintiff shall file her opposition to defendant's motion to stay, or alternatively, to dismiss the Complaint by 02/07/22 with Defendant's reply due 02/28/22 and the hearing shall be noticed for 03/10/22 at 2:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as convenient for the Court. The parties' deadline to meet and confer is EXTENDED to 2 weeks after the Court's ruling on defendant's motion. The parties' deadline to object to the Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order is EXTENDED to 4 weeks after the Court's ruling on defendant's motion. (Benson, A.) |
Filing 11 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Extension of Defendant Nike, Inc.'s Time to Respond to Complaint, and to Extend Other Case Deadlines by Nike, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Henn, Emily) |
Filing 10 JOINT NOTICE of Class Action by Nike, Inc.. (Henn, Emily) Modified on 11/3/2021 (Kaminski, H). |
Filing 9 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Jenna Zhang on behalf of Nike, Inc.. Attorney Zhang, Jenna added. (Zhang, Jenna) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Matthew Verdin on behalf of Nike, Inc.. Attorney Verdin, Matthew added. (Verdin, Matthew) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Simon J Frankel on behalf of Nike, Inc.. Attorney Frankel, Simon J added. (Frankel, Simon) |
Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendant Nike, Inc.. (Henn, Emily) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Emily Henn on behalf of Nike, Inc.. Attorney Henn, Emily added. (Henn, Emily) |
Filing 4 WAIVER of SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED: Waiver sent to Nike, Inc. on 10/6/2021, Answer due 12/6/2021 (Smith, Joel) |
Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Nike, Inc.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Joel Dashiell Smith* *Bursor & Fisher, P.A.* *1990 North California Blvd., Suite 940* *Walnut Creek, CA 94596*. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nike, Inc. by Lisa Castro. Attorney Smith, Joel Dashiell added. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-9849379) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Smith, Joel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Castro v. Nike, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Lisa Castro | |
Represented By: | Joel Dashiell Smith |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Nike, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Emily Henn |
Represented By: | Matthew Verdin |
Represented By: | Simon J Frankel |
Represented By: | Jenna Zhang |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.