Ibea v. Cook Incorporated et al
Raquel S. Ibea |
Cook Incorporated, Cook Medical Incorporated, Cook Group Incorporated and Cook Medical, LLC |
2:2021cv01876 |
October 8, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
John A Mendez |
Jeremy D Peterson |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
OTHER COURT CASE NUMBER from Southern District of Indiana case number 1:21-cv-06674. (Gonzalez, R) |
Filing 5 MDL ORDER. CASE TRANSFERRED to the Southern District of Indiana. Electronic Record Sent. CASE CLOSED. (Donati, J) |
Filing 4 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 Order re Filing Requirements, #3 VDRP) (Reader, L) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Cook Group Incorporated, Cook Incorporated, Cook Medical Incorporated, Cook Medical, LLC* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Gregory D. Rueb* *Dalimonte Rueb Stoller, LLP* *515 S. Figueroa Street, Suite 1550* *Los Angeles, California 90071*. (Reader, L) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of RELATED CASE(S) 1:14-ml-2570-RLY-TAB by Raquel S. Ibea. (Rueb, Gregory) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Raquel S. Ibea. Attorney Rueb, Gregory David added. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-9865030) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rueb, Gregory) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.