Bee Creek Photography v. Riskalyze, Inc.
Tod Grubbs and Bee Creek Photography |
Riskalyze, Inc. |
2:2021cv01884 |
October 11, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Kimberly J Mueller |
Kendall J Newman |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. ยง 501 Copyright Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 CASE CLOSED: pursuant to #16 Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal. (Coll, A) |
Filing 16 STIPULATION of DISMISSAL by Bee Creek Photography. (Sanders, Craig) |
Filing 15 MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy C. Schultz for Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/10/2022: Pursuant to the parties' representations, the court has determined this case has settled. (See ECF No. #14 ) Dispositional documents shall be filed no later than 4/25/2022. Accordingly, all previously set deadlines/hearings are VACATED. (Text Only Entry)(Schultz, C) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of SETTLEMENT by Riskalyze, Inc.. Dispositional Docs due by 4/25/2022. (Escovedo, Joshua) |
Filing 13 ANSWER by Riskalyze, Inc..(Escovedo, Joshua) |
Filing 12 MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy C. Schultz for Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 2/11/2022: On the court's own motion, the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference set for 2/24/2022 is RESET for 3/10/2022 at 2:30 PM before Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. The March Hearing will proceed by video conferencing through the Zoom application. The Courtroom Deputy will provide counsel with the hearing access information no less than 24 hours before the hearing. (Text Only Entry)(Schultz, C) |
Filing 11 JOINT STATUS REPORT by Riskalyze, Inc.. (Escovedo, Joshua) |
Filing 10 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Riskalyze, Inc. by Bee Creek Photography. Attorney Sanders, Craig B. added. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Sanders, Craig) Modified on 2/2/2022 (Reader, L). |
Filing 9 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 01/12/2022 GRANTING Plaintiff leave to file a First Amended Complaint by 02/07/2022. (Rodriguez, E) |
Filing 8 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Filing First Amended Complaint by Riskalyze, Inc.. (Escovedo, Joshua) |
Filing 7 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 12/8/2021 EXTENDING time for defendant to file an answer to 1/3/2022. (Donati, J) |
Filing 6 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint by Riskalyze, Inc.. (Escovedo, Joshua) |
Filing 5 STIPULATION to EXTEND TIME to 12/1/2021, for Defendant to Respond to #1 Complaint by Riskalyze, Inc. Attorney Escovedo, Joshua Heath added. (Escovedo, Joshua) Modified on 11/12/2021 (York, M). |
Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Riskalyze, Inc. served on 10/13/2021, answer due 11/3/2021. (Sanders, Craig) |
Filing 3 COPYRIGHT NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED Initial Scheduling Conference set for 2/24/2022 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Reader, L) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Riskalyze, Inc.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Craig B. Sanders* *Sanders Law Group* *100 Garden City Plaza, Suite 500* *Garden City, NY 11530*. (Reader, L) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Riskalyze, Inc. by Tod Grubbs. Attorney Sanders, Craig B. added. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-9865430) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Copyright Report)(Sanders, Craig) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.