(HC) Dennis v. Samul
Petitioner: Robert K. Dennis
Respondent: D Samul and D. Samul
Case Number: 2:2021cv01906
Filed: October 14, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Dennis M Cota
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 12/2/2021 GRANTING petitioner's #11 letter construed as a motion. Petitioner shall resolve the fee status of this case, consistent with the Court's 10/25/2021 order, within 30 days.(Yin, K)
December 3, 2021 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #12 Order served on Robert K. Dennis. (Yin, K)
November 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Letter re Filing Fee by Robert K. Dennis. (Rodriguez, E)(Response sent: "This court received plaintiff's filing with a copy of the face of a check on November 8, 2021. It appears that it was addressed to the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California and not for the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California. The records from the Central District transferred to our court does not indicate the fee being paid.") Modified on 11/24/2021 (Plummer, M). Modified on 12/3/2021 (Yin, K).
November 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 NOTICE re Filing Fee Payment by Robert K. Dennis. (Rodriguez, E)(Response sent: "As of November 10, 2021, this court has not received petitioner's habeas corpus filing fee.") Modified on 11/10/2021 (Plummer, M).
October 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Rodriguez, E)
October 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE re Filing Fee by Robert K. Dennis. (Rodriguez, E)
October 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 10/22/2021 ORDERING petitioner shall submit, within 30 days, a complete ifp application with the required certification or the appropriate filing fee. The Clerk shall send petitioner an ifp form. (Yin, K)
October 25, 2021 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #7 Order and ifp form served on Robert K. Dennis. (Yin, K)
October 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 11/18/2021. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Marrujo, C)
October 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 CASE TRANSFERRED IN from District of California Central; Case Number 2:21-cv-06621.
October 14, 2021 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Robert K. Dennis. (Marrujo, C)
October 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER TRANSFERRING ACTION TO THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SACRAMENTO DIVISION) by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court transfer this matter to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento Division. See E.D. Cal. L.R. 120(d). (see document for further details). Original file, certified copy of the transfer order and docket sheet sent electronically. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (hr) [Transferred from cacd on 10/14/2021.]
August 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and referred to Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (Attachments: #1 CV-111) (mrgo) [Transferred from cacd on 10/14/2021.]
August 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by petitioner Robert K Dennis. (mrgo) [Transferred from cacd on 10/14/2021.]
August 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254) Case assigned to Judge Fernando M. Olguin and referred to Magistrate Judge Pedro V Castillo.(Filing fee due), filed by petitioner Robert K Dennis. (mrgo) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/19/2021: #1 CV-111) (mrgo). [Transferred from cacd on 10/14/2021.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (HC) Dennis v. Samul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Robert K. Dennis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: D Samul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: D. Samul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?