(HC) Whitsitt v. State of California
| William J. Whitsitt |
| State of California |
| 2:2021cv02019 |
| November 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Jeremy D Peterson |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by William J. Whitsitt. (Benson, A.) Modified on 12/29/2021 (Plummer, M).
|
|
Filing 11
NOTICE re Competency Training by William J. Whitsitt. (Huang, H)
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION for TREATMENT by William J. Whitsitt. (Coll, A)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 12/6/2021 ORDERING petitioner to submit, within 30 days, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed ifp or the appropriate filing fee. The Clerk shall send petitioner an ifp form. (Yin, K)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #9 Order and ifp form served on William J. Whitsitt. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing 8
SUPPLEMENT by William J. Whitsitt re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE by William J. Whitsitt of new facts for claim of writ of habeas corpus. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing 6
SUPPLEMENT by William J. Whitsitt re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by William J. Whitsitt. (Huang, H)
|
|
Filing 4
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 11/3/2021 ORDERING petitioner to submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, either an affidavit in support of his request to proceed IFP or the appropriate filing fee. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Order and IFP application served on William J. Whitsitt. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #2 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on William J. Whitsitt. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing 2
PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 12/6/2021. (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against State of California by William J. Whitsitt. (MAINTAINED ON PAPER) (Kastilahn, A) (Main Document 1 replaced on 11/3/2021) (Kastilahn, A).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: (HC) Whitsitt v. State of California | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: William J. Whitsitt | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: State of California | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
