Elstein v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
| Mark Elstein |
| Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Equifax Information Services, LLC, TransUnion, LLC and Bethpage Federal Credit Union |
| 2:2021cv02059 |
| November 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Morrison C England |
| Jeremy D Peterson |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 1/5/2022 EXTENDING the deadline to respond to the #1 Complaint to 1/19/2022. (Coll, A)
|
| Filing 17 NOTICE of SETTLEMENT (with Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC) by Mark Elstein. (Angelo, Joseph) Modified on 1/5/2022 (Kaminski, H). |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of SETTLEMENT (with Defendant Bethpage FCU) by Mark Elstein. (Angelo, Joseph) Modified on 1/5/2022 (Kaminski, H). |
| Filing 15 SECOND STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER to Extend Deadline to Respond to #1 Complaint by Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Sun, Jennifer) Modified on 1/6/2022 (Huang, H). |
| Filing 14 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (Sun, Jennifer) |
| Filing 13 STIPULATION to Extend Time for Experian Information Solutions, Inc. to Respond to #1 Complaint by Experian Information Solutions, Inc. Attorney Sun, Jennifer added. (Sun, Jennifer) Modified on 12/2/2021 (Huang, H). |
| Filing 12 STIPULATION to Extend Time to Respond to #1 Complaint by Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Quinn, Thomas) Modified on 11/30/2021 (Huang, H). |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Thomas P. Quinn, Jr on behalf of Equifax Information Services, LLC. Attorney Quinn, Thomas P. added. (Quinn, Thomas) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER by TransUnion, LLC.(Roberts, Jason) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 11/24/2021 GRANTING #8 Stipulation to Extend Time. Defendant Bethpage Federal Credit Union's Response to the Complaint is due by 1/18/2022. (Donati, J)
|
| Filing 8 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Respond to #1 Complaint by Bethpage Federal Credit Union. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Richter, Stuart) Modified on 11/23/2021 (Coll, A). |
| Filing 7 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendant Bethpage Federal Credit Union. (Richter, Stuart) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Stuart Matthew Richter on behalf of Bethpage Federal Credit Union. Attorney Richter, Stuart Matthew added. (Richter, Stuart) |
| Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendant TransUnion, LLC. (Roberts, Jason) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Jason Roberts on behalf of TransUnion, LLC. Attorney Roberts, Jason added. (Roberts, Jason) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Kaminski, H) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Bethpage Federal Credit Union, Equifax Information Services, LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc., TransUnion, LLC* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Joseph Angelo* *Gale Angelo Johnson & Pruett, P.C.* *1430 Blue Oaks Blvd., Suite 250* *Roseville, CA 95747*. (Kaminski, H) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Mark Elstein. Attorney Angelo, Joseph added. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-9916402) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Angelo, Joseph). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
