(PS) Van Den Heuvel v. Dorothy et al
| Jean Marc Van Den Heuvel |
| Dorothy, Krystal and Carolyn |
| 2:2021cv02176 |
| November 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Carolyn K Delaney |
| Troy L Nunley |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
CERTIFICATE of SERVICE by Jean Marc Van Den Heuvel re #4 Order. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/10/2022 GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP and ORDERING that within 30 days of this order, plaintiff shall file either a first amended complaint in accordance with this order, or a notice of voluntary dismissal of the action. Failure to timely comply with this order will result in a recommendation that the action be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). (Huang, H)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Order, served on Jean Marc Van Den Heuvel. (Huang, H)
|
|
Filing 3
CERTIFICATE of SERVICE by Jean Marc Van Den Heuvel re #1 Complaint. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Court Action Required. (Rodriguez, E)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Jean Marc Van Den Heuvel. (Rodriguez, E)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Carolyn, Dorothy, Krystal by Jean Marc Van Den Heuvel. (Rodriguez, E)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
