(PC) Miller v. Amador County Jail
| Bobby Joe Miller |
| Amador County Jail |
| 2:2021cv02226 |
| December 3, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Dennis M Cota |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 1/28/2022 DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Bobby Joe Miller. Plaintiff is obligated to pay the full statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. The custodial agency shall collect an initial partial filing fee and monthly payments in accordance with this order until the filing fee of $350 is paid in full. (cc: Financial Department) (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 1/28/2022 GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #9 Order Directing Prisoner Payment and #8 Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis served on Bobby Joe Miller. Motion to Proceed IFP and #9 Order Directing Prisoner Payment served on Amador County Jail, 700 Court Street, Jackson, California 95642. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE re COVID in Amador County Jail by Bobby Joe Miller. (Coll, A)
|
|
Filing 6
PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT by Bobby Joe Miller (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing 5
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 12/8/2021 ORDERING plaintiff to submit, within 30 days, a complete ifp application, with the required certified copy of his trust account statement, or the appropriate filing fee. The Clerk shall send plaintiff a new ifp application form. (Yin, K)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Order and ifp application served on Bobby Joe Miller. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing 3
PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 1/10/2022 (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Coll, A)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Bobby Joe Miller. (Coll, A)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Bobby Joe Miller. (Coll, A)
|
|
Filing 1
PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Amador County Jail by Bobby Joe Miller. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Coll, A)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: (PC) Miller v. Amador County Jail | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Bobby Joe Miller | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Amador County Jail | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
