(HC) Campbell v. Perry
Petitioner: Isiah Campbell
Respondent: S. Perry
Case Number: 2:2021cv02369
Filed: December 20, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Carolyn K Delaney
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 2/2/2022 DENYING without prejudice petitioner's #7 request for the appointment of counsel and DENYING as moot petitioner's #8 motion to proceed ifp since petitioner paid the filing fee in this matter. (Yin, K)
February 3, 2022 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #9 Order on Motions served on Isiah Campbell. (Yin, K)
January 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Isiah Campbell. (Kastilahn, A)
January 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MOTION to APPOINT COUNSEL by Isiah Campbell. (Kastilahn, A)
January 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 DOCUMENT SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus served on Tami Krenzin, Supervising Deputy Attorney General. (Henshaw, R)
January 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER RE CONSENT OR REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/4/2022. Consent or Decline due by 2/7/2022. (cc: Tami Krenzin, Supervising Deputy Attorney General) (Henshaw, R)
January 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/3/2022 DIRECTING RESPONDENT to File a Response to Petition within 60 days from the date of this order. Clerk to serve a copy of this order, a copy of the Petition and the Order re Consent on the Attorney General. (cc: Tami Krenzin, Supervising Deputy Attorney General) (Henshaw, R)
January 4, 2022 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Order served on Isiah Campbell. (Henshaw, R)
January 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Huang, H)
December 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 1/24/2022 (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Rodriguez, E)
December 22, 2021 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #2 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Isiah Campbell. (Rodriguez, E)
December 21, 2021 Opinion or Order RECEIPT number CAE200118375 for $5.00 (Rodriguez, E)
December 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against S. Perry by Isiah Campbell.(Rodriguez, E)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (HC) Campbell v. Perry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Isiah Campbell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: S. Perry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?