(HC)Higgs v. Cates
Maurice D. Higgs |
B. Cates |
2:2021cv02415 |
December 27, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Dennis M Cota |
Kimberly J Mueller |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY). This case has been assigned to Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller and Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota. The new case number is: 2:21-cv-2415 KJM DMC (HC). (Plummer, M) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: 8 Clerk's Notice Reassigning Case served on Maurice D. Higgs. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Eldridge, David) |
Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Huang, H) |
Filing 5 DOCUMENT SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus served on Tami M. Krenzin, Supervising Deputy Attorney General. (Henshaw, R) |
Filing 4 ORDER RE CONSENT OR REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 1/21/2022. Consent or Decline due by 2/25/2022. (cc: Tami M. Krenzin, Supervising Deputy Attorney General) (Henshaw, R) |
Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 1/20/2022 DIRECTING RESPONDENT to File a Response to Petition within 60 days from the date of service of this order. Clerk to serve a copy of this order, a copy of the Petition and the Order re Consent on the Attorney General. (cc: Tami M. Krenzin, Supervising Deputy Attorney General) (Henshaw, R) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Order served on Maurice D. Higgs. (Henshaw, R) |
RECEIPT number #CAE200118561 $5.00 by Maurice D. Higgs on 1/7/2022. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 2 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 1/31/2022 (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Reader, L) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #2 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Maurice D. Higgs. (Reader, L) |
Filing 1 PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against B. Cates by Maurice D. Higgs.(Reader, L) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: (HC)Higgs v. Cates | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Maurice D. Higgs | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: B. Cates | |
Represented By: | David Andrew Eldridge |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.