(PC) Hatton v. Mills
| Eric Dewayne Hatton |
| Mills |
| 2:2021cv02416 |
| December 27, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Kendall J Newman |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
FIRST AMENDED PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Mills by Eric Dewayne Hatton. (Rodriguez, E)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Amendment by Eric Dewayne Hatton. (Rodriguez, E)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/19/2022 DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Eric Dewayne Hatton. The custodial agency shall collect an initial partial filing fee and monthly payments in accordance with this order until the filing fee of $350 is paid in full. (cc: Financial Department) (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/19/2022 GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP; DISMISSING Plaintiff's complaint; and ORDERING Plaintiff to complete the attached Notice of Amendment and submit it with an original of the amended complaint within 30 days from the date of this order. Plaintiff to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00. All fees to be collected and paid in accordance with this court's order to the Sheriff of Sacramento County filed concurrently herewith. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Order Directing Prisoner Payment, #5 Order, and complaint form served on Eric Dewayne Hatton. #6 Order Directing Prisoner Payment and Motion to Proceed IFP served on Sheriff of Sacramento County, Attention: Inmate Trust Account, 651 I Street, Sacramento, California 95814. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing 4
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Rodriguez, E)
|
|
Filing 3
PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 1/31/2022 (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Benson, A.)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Eric Dewayne Hatton. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Eric Dewayne Hatton. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing 1
PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Mills by Eric Dewayne Hatton.(Benson, A.)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: (PC) Hatton v. Mills | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Eric Dewayne Hatton | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Mills | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
