Appel v. Wolf
| Howard Appel |
| Robert S. Wolf |
| 2:2021mc00171 |
| July 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Jeremy D Peterson |
| William B Shubb |
| Assault Libel & Slander |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy N. Cannarozzi: Plaintiff's Motion to Quash #1 , which is presently calendared for hearing on 8/26/2021, is ordered submitted without appearance and without argument pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). The 8/26/2021 hearing date is VACATED. If the court subsequently concludes that oral argument is necessary, a hearing will be set and the parties notified accordingly. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 8/24/2021. (Text only entry)(Cannarozzi, N)
|
| Filing 8 JOINT STATEMENT RE: DISCOVERY DISAGREEMENT filed by Plaintiff Howard Appel. (Brower, Steven) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Order in Related Matters by Howard Appel. (Brower, Steven) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of ERRATA by Robert S. Wolf re #5 Opposition to Motion.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Servais, Andrew) |
| Filing 5 OPPOSITION by Robert S. Wolf to #1 Motion to Quash,. Attorney Servais, Andrew added. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Andrew A. Servais, #2 Exhibits 1 through 17, #3 Proof of Service)(Servais, Andrew) |
| Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER issued by Relief Courtroom Deputy L. Kennison for Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 7/9/2021: In light of the Order referring the motion to Magistrate Judge Peterson, plaintiff's Motion to Quash Subpoena for Production of Business Records, or in the Alternative, for Protective Order, ECF No. #1 is SET for 8/26/2021 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson. (Text Only Entry)(Kennison, L) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of SERVICE by Howard Appel re #1 Motion to Quash. (Brower, Steven) |
| Filing 2 MINUTE ORDER (TEXT ONLY): Per Order of Senior Judge William B. Shubb, plaintiff's #1 Motion to Quash Subpoena for Production of Business Records, or in the alternative, for Protective Order is HEREBY REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson. (Kirksey Smith, K) |
| NEW MISCELLANEOUS CASE FILED re Motion to Quash. (Reader, L) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to QUASH Non-Party Subpoena by Howard Appel. (Payment for miscellaneous case filing fee, Receipt #ACAEDC-9692679) by Steven Brower. Attorney Brower, Steven added. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Steven Brower, #2 Exhibit)(Brower, Steven) Modified on 7/7/2021 (Reader, L). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Appel v. Wolf | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Howard Appel | |
| Represented By: | Steven Brower |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Robert S. Wolf | |
| Represented By: | Andrew Servais |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
