Dawood v. National Public Radio, Inc.
Plaintiff: Mahmood Dawood
Defendant: National Public Radio, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2022at00345
Filed: April 1, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 1, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Mahmood Dawood. (Straus, Alex)
April 1, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Mahmood Dawood (Straus, Alex)
April 1, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against National Public Radio, Inc. by Mahmood Dawood. Attorney Straus, Alex Rafael added. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-10156643) (Straus, Alex)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dawood v. National Public Radio, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mahmood Dawood
Represented By: Alex Rafael Straus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: National Public Radio, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?