Hammond et al v. Roseburg Forest Products Co.
| Nichole Hammond, Shayne Hammond, Kaleb Hammond, C. H. and S. H. |
| Roseburg Forest Products Co. |
| 2:2022at01012 |
| October 5, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Torts to Land |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Torts to Land |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Sacramento County Superior Court, case number 34-2022-00326413 by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Notice of Removal, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Roseburg's Corporate Disclosure Statement, #4 Declaration of Victoria L. Weatherford, #5 Request for Judicial Notice, #6 Exhibit 1 to Request for Judicial Notice, #7 Exhibit 2 to Request for Judicial Notice, #8 Notice of Pendency of Other Action or Proceeding, #9 Exhibit A to Notice of Pendency of Other Action or Proceeding, #10 Exhibit B to Notice of Pendency of Other Action or Proceeding, #11 Exhibit C to Notice of Pendency of Other Action or Proceeding)(Weatherford, Victoria) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Sacramento County Superior Court, case number 34-2022-00326413 by Roseburg Forest Products Co. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-10478813) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Weatherford, Victoria) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
