(PC) Jaramillo v. Tappan et al
| Rudie A. Jaramillo and Rudie Anthony Jaramillo |
| T. Tappan, R. Ehlers, Faye and Manes |
| 2:2022cv00075 |
| January 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Edmund F Brennan |
| William B Shubb |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER RE CONSENT OR REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/18/2022. (for E-Service) (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing 14
SUMMONS ISSUED as to *T. Tappan* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Rudie A. Jaramillo G-07678* *California State Prison, Sacramento* *P.O. Box 290066* *Represa, CA 95671-0066*. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/18/2022 FINDING SERVICE OF COMPLAINT APPROPRIATE AND DIRECTING E-SERVICE on the following defendant: *T. Tappan*. The Clerk shall serve this order via email on the CDCR, along with a summons, the Operative Complaint, the Order re Consent and Notice of E-Service Waiver. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Waiver) (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing 12
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/18/2022 RECOMMENDING plaintiff's claims against defendants R. Ehlers, Faye, and Lieutenant Manes be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #12 Findings and Recommendations, #13 Order Finding Service of Complaint Appropriate served on Rudie Anthony Jaramillo. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing 11
NOTICE OF ELECTION: Plaintiff elects to proceed on complaint as screened by Rudie A. Jaramillo (Reader, L) Modified on 2/18/2022 (Yin, K).
|
|
Filing 10
DOCUMENT(S) SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: IFP application #2 served on Director of CDC. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Rudie A. Jaramillo signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/07/22. CDC shall collect payments from plaintiff's account and forward to the clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. Clerk to serve this order and a copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDC. Clerk to also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDC Director and Financial)(Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/07/22 GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP. Plaintiff shall pay the statutory filing fee of $350. All payments shall be collected in accordance with the notice to the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation filed concurrently herewith. Plaintiff's complaint alleges, for screening purposes, a potentially cognizable Eighth Amendment excessive force claim against defendant T. Tappan. All other claims (including those against defendants Ehlers, Faye, and Manes) are dismissed with leave to amend within 30 days of service of this order. Plaintiff is not obligated to amend his complaint. Within thirty days plaintiff shall return the notice below advising the court whether he elects to proceed with the cognizable claim or file an amended complaint. If the former option is selected and returned, the court will enter an order directing service at that time.. (Plummer, M)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #9 Order Directing Prisoner Payment, served on Rudie A. Jaramillo. (Plummer, M)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #8 Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis,,, served on Rudie A. Jaramillo. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing 7
CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY). This case has been assigned to Senior Judge William B. Shubb and Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. The new case number is: 2:22-cv-0075-WBS-EFB. (Rodriguez, E)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: 7 Clerk's Notice Reassigning Case served on Rudie A. Jaramillo. (Rodriguez, E)
|
|
Filing 6
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Rodriguez, E)
|
|
Filing 5
PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT by Rudie A. Jaramillo (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing 4
CLERKS NOTICE: The Clerk of Court is in receipt of a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is DIRECTED to submit a Certified Prison Trust account statement for Rudie A. Jaramillo, CDC G07678 to the Clerks Office within 72 business hours of this notification. The Prison Trust Account statement must reflect the activity for the last six months. Please email the certified prison trust account statement in pdf format to FilingsSacramento@caed.uscourts.gov with the case number in the subject line as reflected on this notification. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing 3
PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; E-Filing Notice issued re complaint filed *1/12/2022*; Consent or Decline due by 2/17/2022 (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter, #2 E-Filing Notice) (Benson, A.)
|
|
SERVICE BY EMAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Rudie A. Jaramillo. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Rudie A. Jaramillo. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing 1
PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Rudie A. Jaramillo. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Benson, A.)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
