Vanderpan et al v. Tesla, Inc.
| Delbert A. Vanderpan and Cynthia M. Vanderpan |
| Tesla, Inc. Doing business as Tesla Motors, Inc. |
| 2:2022cv00333 |
| February 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Carolyn K Delaney |
| Troy L Nunley |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Extend Time for Defendant To Respond to plaintiffs' Complaint by Tesla, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Tahsildoost, Soheyl) |
| Filing 5 STIPULATION to Extend time for Defendant to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Tesla, Inc.. Attorney Tahsildoost, Soheyl added. (Tahsildoost, Soheyl) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Tesla, Inc. served on 3/3/2022, answer due 3/24/2022. (Wirtz, Richard) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Huang, H) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Tesla, Inc.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Richard Michael Wirtz* *Wirtz Law APC* *4370 La Jolla Village Dr., Suite 800* *San Diego, CA 92122*. (Huang, H) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Tesla, Inc. by Delbert A. Vanderpan, Cynthia M. Vanderpan. Attorney Wirtz, Richard Michael added. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-10086054) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Wirtz, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
