(HC) Sessoms v. Unknown
Petitioner: Tio Dinero Sessoms
Respondent: Unknown
Case Number: 2:2022cv00420
Filed: March 7, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Allison Claire
Referring Judge: Troy L Nunley
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 OBJECTIONS to FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS #7 by Tio Dinero Sessoms. (Reader, L)
April 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 4/07/22 ORDERING the Clerk of the Court shall randomlyassign a United States District Judge to this action. Also, RECOMMENDING that petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Assigned and referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 21 days.(Plummer, M)
April 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY). This case has been assigned to District Judge Troy L. Nunley and Magistrate Judge Allison Claire. The new case number is: 2:22-cv-0420 TLN AC (HC). (Plummer, M)
April 7, 2022 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #7 Order,, Findings and Recommendations (Motion), served on Tio Dinero Sessoms. (Plummer, M)
April 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 RESPONSE by Tio Dinero Sessoms to #3 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE. (Rodriguez, E)
March 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Benson, A.)
March 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 3/8/2022 ORDERING, within 30 days, petitioner must show cause in writing why the petition should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. (Yin, K)
March 9, 2022 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Order to Show Cause served on Tio Dinero Sessoms. (Yin, K)
March 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 4/11/2022. (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Rodriguez, E)
March 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Unknown by Tio Dinero Sessoms.(Rodriguez, E)
March 7, 2022 Opinion or Order RECEIPT number #CAE200119674 $5.00 fbo Tio Dinero Sessoms by Tio Dinero Sessoms on 3/7/2022. (Rodriguez, E)
March 7, 2022 Opinion or Order SERVICE AT COUNTER: #2 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Tio Dinero Sessoms. (Rodriguez, E)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (HC) Sessoms v. Unknown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Tio Dinero Sessoms
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Unknown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?