(HC) MacDonald v. Lynch
| Devonta MacDonald and Devonta J. MacDonald |
| Jeff Lynch |
| 2:2022cv00477 |
| March 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Allison Claire |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL (TEXT ONLY) pursuant to #3 Motion to Dismiss and FRCP 41(a). CASE CLOSED. (Plummer, M) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to DISMISS by Devonta J. MacDonald. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Spolin, Aaron) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 4/18/2022. (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Rodriguez, E) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Jeff Lynch by Devonta MacDonald. Attorney Spolin, Aaron added (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-10120217) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Spolin, Aaron). Refund Requested of $402.00 Filing Fee. Filer paid incorrect amount for habeas filing fee; refunded receipt ACAEDC-10120217 after they paid the correct amount of $5. Modified on 3/16/2022 (Woodson, A). |
| PAYMENT for habeas petition filing fee in the amount of $ 5, receipt number ACAEDC-10121499. (Spolin, Aaron) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
