Hearne v. Bravo Security Services, Inc. et al
Marcell Hearne |
Bravo Security Services, Inc., Furqan Khaliq and Numaan Khaliq |
2:2022cv00531 |
March 22, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Deborah Barnes |
Morrison C England |
Labor: Fair Standards |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT by Marcell Hearne. (Allen, George) |
Filing 8 ANSWER with Jury Demand by Numaan Khaliq.(Nowland, Thomas) |
Filing 7 ANSWER with Jury Demand by Furqan Khaliq.(Nowland, Thomas) |
Filing 6 ANSWER with Jury Demand by Bravo Security Services, Inc..(Nowland, Thomas) |
Filing 5 STIPULATION to EXTEND TIME to Respond to Complaint by 28 Days by Bravo Security Services, Inc. Attorney Nowland, Thomas F added. (Nowland, Thomas) Modified on 4/18/2022 (Coll, A). |
Filing 4 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Huang, H) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Bravo Security Services, Inc., Furqan Khaliq, Numaan Khaliq* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *George F. Allen* *Attorney at Law* *1903 21st Street* *Sacramento, CA 95811*. (Huang, H) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Marcell Hearne. (Allen, George) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Marcell Hearne. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-10135793) (Allen, George) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.